<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: class-map type inspect statement with out match statement  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062907#M894376</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually it will not pass or drop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the logic is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the calss map do matching then if there any match happend then the policy map that associated with this class will look what action configured to be taken&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in ur case nothing will be match so the next stage which is the action stage will not be considered &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-29T21:46:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>class-map type inspect statement with out match statement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062904#M894372</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In a ZBF (IOS 12.4(20)T1, what happens if the following class-map is used in a policy which is tied to a zone pair and an interface, but the class-map does not have a "match" statement under it?  Is the default to drop all since there is no match?  Or since there is a "match-any" statement, does it pass all traffic?  This was set up automatically by SDM 2.5 and I'm trying to figure out what will happen here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map type inspect match-any no-match&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map type inspect match-all willwork&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match class-map no-match&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; match access-group 110&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map type inspect whathappens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; class type inspect willwork&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  inspect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; class class-default&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  drop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone security in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone security out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone-pair security out-self source out destination self&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; service-policy type inspect whathappens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet 0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; description Untrusted&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; zone-member security out&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Scott&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062904#M894372</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdniel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:04:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: class-map type inspect statement with out match statement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062905#M894373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;as long as the class dose not have match &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no action will be taken until the match occuer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so nothing will happen &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to make sure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do show policy-map  whathappens  interface GigabitEthernet 0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and see the matched traffic&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it show 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good luck&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if helpful Rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062905#M894373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-29T02:45:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: class-map type inspect statement with out match statement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062906#M894374</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you say "nothing will happen", are you saying it will "pass" all traffic or "drop" all traffic?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:36:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062906#M894374</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdniel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-29T14:36:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: class-map type inspect statement with out match statement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062907#M894376</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;actually it will not pass or drop&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the logic is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the calss map do matching then if there any match happend then the policy map that associated with this class will look what action configured to be taken&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in ur case nothing will be match so the next stage which is the action stage will not be considered &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062907#M894376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-29T21:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: class-map type inspect statement with out match statement</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062908#M894378</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So in this case, since class-map no-match is nested within class-map willwork, which has a match-all statement match class-map no-match "anded" with access list 110, does the policy whathappens inspect packets for only access-group 110?  Wou8ld the result be the same if class-map no-match did not exist at all?  You state that is does not pass or drop packets, so what does it do with them? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/class-map-type-inspect-statement-with-out-match-statement/m-p/1062908#M894378</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdniel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-30T14:07:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

