<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic reload FWSM? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041929#M894542</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create another transparent security context in the my company's FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are already several other security contexts created: 4 - routed &amp;amp; 1 - transparent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;recently, we re-partitioned from the default 12 memory partitions to 5 memory partitions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to create a new transparent security context ... that shouldn't require a FWSM reload, should it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ksvy_ksvy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:02:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>reload FWSM?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041929#M894542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create another transparent security context in the my company's FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are already several other security contexts created: 4 - routed &amp;amp; 1 - transparent&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;recently, we re-partitioned from the default 12 memory partitions to 5 memory partitions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just want to create a new transparent security context ... that shouldn't require a FWSM reload, should it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:02:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041929#M894542</guid>
      <dc:creator>ksvy_ksvy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T14:02:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reload FWSM?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041930#M894544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kevin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Creating a new context does not require a reload but be aware that if you have only 5 memory partitions created and all 5 have been allocated a context then your new context will have to share a memory context with an existing partition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:40:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041930#M894544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-24T18:40:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reload FWSM?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041931#M894546</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Kevin,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no need to reload the FWSM when you create the context in multiple context mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arul&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*Pls rate if it helps*&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:48:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041931#M894546</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajagadee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-24T18:48:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: reload FWSM?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041932#M894548</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;true, two of the larger ACL'ed contexts have their own memory partition, and the remaining are smaller ones will be sharing memory partitions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cool, thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/reload-fwsm/m-p/1041932#M894548</guid>
      <dc:creator>ksvy_ksvy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-24T18:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

