<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Query in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093138#M894992</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:47:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ray_stone</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-16T18:47:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093136#M894989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,If i create V-lans on FW and same V-lans I configure on switch. Which one wud be great option as per security concerned. Switch or FW???? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:58:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093136#M894989</guid>
      <dc:creator>ray_stone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:58:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093137#M894991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its better to have VLANs configured on FW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a)FW treats VLAN on itself just like another logical interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b)Will not allow traffic to flow across this VLAN/Interface unless you have ACLs and translation in place, also only traffic for which there is a valid connection would be allowed to this VLAN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c)Switch does not have statefull nature/security , which means if there is Inter-VLAN routing enabled on this switch the packet would start flowing to/from this "VLAN"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unless you have VACLs blocking this traffic,which again is only L3 security but no statefullness&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093137#M894991</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-16T17:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093138#M894992</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:47:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/query/m-p/1093138#M894992</guid>
      <dc:creator>ray_stone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-16T18:47:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

