<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic no nat control in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072793#M895785</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;if theres "no nat control" in an asa implementation, is there any security issue in here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cfajardo1_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:50:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>no nat control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072793#M895785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if theres "no nat control" in an asa implementation, is there any security issue in here...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:50:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072793#M895785</guid>
      <dc:creator>cfajardo1_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:50:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no nat control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072794#M895787</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;this will disable the requerment of the firewall that communication between any two interface on the firewall will contin a nat u can make nat exmption but u need an imlimintaion for that &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if u disable it no need for nat between interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the issue is without nating the security will be less&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if helpful Rate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072794#M895787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marwan ALshawi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-28T10:05:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: no nat control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072795#M895793</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whether it's a true "issue" or not is really up to your security team to decide.  A well-maintained access list on the outside interface is more important than obscure NAT configurations IMO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/no-nat-control/m-p/1072795#M895793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matthew Warrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-29T00:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

