<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FWSM failover question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046064#M896001</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. All interfaces are fine. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are not any errors neither between switches, nor on interfaces to the modules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All I can see is mentioned errors in show failover's output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Maxim Zimovets</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-25T05:14:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FWSM failover question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046062#M895995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a pair of cat65xx with ws-svc-fwm module installed in each. Both modules are running version 2.3(4). Failover was set up on modules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got following output from show failover:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FWSM# sh failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover On &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Failover unit Primary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        This host: Primary - Standby &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;: &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       Other host: Secondary - Active &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stateful Failover Logical Update Statistics&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        Link : fo-data Vlan 995&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        Stateful Obj    xmit       xerr       rcv        rerr      &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        General         640440     0          632804     0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        sys cmd         632714     0          632714     0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        up time         0          0          0          0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        RPC services    858        0          0          0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        xlate           0          0          0          0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        TCP conn        289461409  0          1658093    0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        UDP conn        0          0          0          0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        ARP tbl         5313       0          76         0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        RIP Tbl         0          0          0          0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        L2BRIDGE Tbl    0          0          0          0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        Xlate_Timeout   1555       0          14         0         &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        TCP NPs         581795264  0          8071343    4523030   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        UDP NPs         39871943   0          240369     4523030   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a lot of receive errors (rerr) for counters TCP NPs and UDP NPs. Unfortunately I was not able to find neither good description for the counters, nor any reason why the counters grow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anybody give me some glue about counters or errors?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maxim Zimovets&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046062#M895995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxim Zimovets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:48:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM failover question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046063#M895998</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope you must have checked, whether interface connecting 2 65XX are error-free !!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:02:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046063#M895998</guid>
      <dc:creator>satish_zanjurne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-24T12:02:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FWSM failover question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046064#M896001</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes. All interfaces are fine. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are not any errors neither between switches, nor on interfaces to the modules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All I can see is mentioned errors in show failover's output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:14:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/fwsm-failover-question/m-p/1046064#M896001</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxim Zimovets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-25T05:14:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

