<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question on PIX - VPN bulk sync in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038588#M896031</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a cable(serial) connected Active/Standby PIX firewall setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the &lt;B&gt;standby&lt;/B&gt; unit recovers after a failure, there is a &lt;B&gt;VPN Bulk Sync&lt;/B&gt; process, where the active unit starts syncing the state information to the standby unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;During this process does the active unit freeze/lock all it's VPN connections?&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to my understanding, it should not affect the active VPN traffic, however it seems so.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the clarification &amp;amp; providing with related references(if any).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RanilG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:47:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question on PIX - VPN bulk sync</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038588#M896031</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a cable(serial) connected Active/Standby PIX firewall setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the &lt;B&gt;standby&lt;/B&gt; unit recovers after a failure, there is a &lt;B&gt;VPN Bulk Sync&lt;/B&gt; process, where the active unit starts syncing the state information to the standby unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;B&gt;During this process does the active unit freeze/lock all it's VPN connections?&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;According to my understanding, it should not affect the active VPN traffic, however it seems so.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the clarification &amp;amp; providing with related references(if any).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:47:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038588#M896031</guid>
      <dc:creator>RanilG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:47:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question on PIX - VPN bulk sync</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038589#M896033</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;First of all,you need to run stateful failover for zero disruption of traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondly,in 6.x train,vpn statfulness is not supported.That is,if with 6.x,even with statful setup ,during a failover event,vpn connections would drop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondly,if you are running 7.x or 8.x code,you would need to setup stateful failover.With 7.x and 8.x code,vpn statefulness is supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Link :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/failover.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/failover.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sushil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:58:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038589#M896033</guid>
      <dc:creator>suschoud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-23T12:58:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question on PIX - VPN bulk sync</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038590#M896035</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PIXos is 7.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is regarding the status of active unit connections upon recovery of the &lt;B&gt;standby unit&lt;/B&gt; after a failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've already referred to your link and according to it (Ref:Table 14-1 Failover Behavior) there's 'No Failover' of the active unit upon failure of standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To repeat my question,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When &lt;B&gt;VPN bulk sync&lt;/B&gt; and &lt;B&gt;End configuration Replication&lt;/B&gt; take place are the active unit connections locked?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If not what could lead to a disruption of traffic(OS bug, high CPU )?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/question-on-pix-vpn-bulk-sync/m-p/1038590#M896035</guid>
      <dc:creator>RanilG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-23T13:19:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

