<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cache pollution on DNS servers in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cache-pollution-on-dns-servers/m-p/551894#M90227</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the general sense of cache pollution (cache poisoning) - DNS responses contain additional records that do not pertain to the query in an effort to poison the DNS server's cache.  No, there is no signature for this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know Microsoft has a "cache pollution protection" knob on their DNS servers and recent versions of BIND also contain code to perform some additional checks and ignore the non-relevant responses. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:38:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-22T20:38:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cache pollution on DNS servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cache-pollution-on-dns-servers/m-p/551893#M90226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;looking for the sigID that would fire on this. We are running 4.1(5)S216.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cache-pollution-on-dns-servers/m-p/551893#M90226</guid>
      <dc:creator>5creedus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:56:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cache pollution on DNS servers</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cache-pollution-on-dns-servers/m-p/551894#M90227</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the general sense of cache pollution (cache poisoning) - DNS responses contain additional records that do not pertain to the query in an effort to poison the DNS server's cache.  No, there is no signature for this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know Microsoft has a "cache pollution protection" knob on their DNS servers and recent versions of BIND also contain code to perform some additional checks and ignore the non-relevant responses. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 20:38:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/cache-pollution-on-dns-servers/m-p/551894#M90227</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsulym</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-22T20:38:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

