<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IPS-K9-min-5.1-1c.pkg in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-k9-min-5-1-1c-pkg/m-p/510621#M90285</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;After upgrading to 5.1-1c when I enter a "sh Ver" it still reports version 5.1-1. Is this normal will it not show the rev c&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>h.parsons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:55:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IPS-K9-min-5.1-1c.pkg</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-k9-min-5-1-1c-pkg/m-p/510621#M90285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After upgrading to 5.1-1c when I enter a "sh Ver" it still reports version 5.1-1. Is this normal will it not show the rev c&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-k9-min-5-1-1c-pkg/m-p/510621#M90285</guid>
      <dc:creator>h.parsons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:55:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IPS-K9-min-5.1-1c.pkg</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-k9-min-5-1-1c-pkg/m-p/510622#M90286</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is normal, just as it 5.1.1a did not show the letter after it was installed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ips-k9-min-5-1-1c-pkg/m-p/510622#M90286</guid>
      <dc:creator>ibanezm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-14T15:17:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

