<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic I'd imagine the devices in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/macsec-questions/m-p/3006983#M908247</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd imagine the devices between the MACSEC Switches are going to struggle to correctly pass on the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;As far as I know the entire frame payload in encrypted, this payload will make no sense to an upstrem device not running MACSEC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;The easiest solution, if I were you, would be...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Get the two MacSec Switches working in the lab, back to back with a fibre or ethernet connection, so you can fully confirm your configuration is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Make sure you are happy they are communicating freely.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Then place your devices, hubs etc between and see if things break.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;The fact that the netgear switch works at all is surprising.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;I don't see how you are going get this working across a wireless link thought !!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Regards to your second question - yes spanning tree CDP VTP are all supported - once the switches are directly connected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>keanej</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-25T09:21:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MACSec questions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/macsec-questions/m-p/3006982#M908246</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have two 3850 switches.&amp;nbsp; We need to run MACsec between the switches but connect the switches with a wireless point-to-point link.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I have questions about this:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Does the PtP link required to understand MACsec, support the ethernet type, multicast destination MAC etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Should STP be enabled on both the PtP link switches to get MACsec to work?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. We have a 5-port NetGear Hub and a 5-port NetGear Switch.&amp;nbsp; MACsec doesn't work when we connect the switches through the hub, but it does work when we connect them through the switch.&amp;nbsp; I am curious as to how the cisco figures out when it is attached to the hub...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;K-&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:02:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/macsec-questions/m-p/3006982#M908246</guid>
      <dc:creator>wkunice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T14:02:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I'd imagine the devices</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/macsec-questions/m-p/3006983#M908247</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd imagine the devices between the MACSEC Switches are going to struggle to correctly pass on the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;As far as I know the entire frame payload in encrypted, this payload will make no sense to an upstrem device not running MACSEC.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;The easiest solution, if I were you, would be...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Get the two MacSec Switches working in the lab, back to back with a fibre or ethernet connection, so you can fully confirm your configuration is correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Make sure you are happy they are communicating freely.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Then place your devices, hubs etc between and see if things break.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;The fact that the netgear switch works at all is surprising.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;I don't see how you are going get this working across a wireless link thought !!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;Regards to your second question - yes spanning tree CDP VTP are all supported - once the switches are directly connected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:21:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/macsec-questions/m-p/3006983#M908247</guid>
      <dc:creator>keanej</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-25T09:21:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

