<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Anyone come up with a custom sig for WMF Exploit? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488023#M90829</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Based on bleeding snort sid, this is what I've got, but it doesn't seem to be working:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wmf exploit file:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;\x01\x00\x09\x00\x00\x03.{10}\x00\x00.{0, 5000}\x26\x06\x09\x00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mmoulder16</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:49:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Anyone come up with a custom sig for WMF Exploit?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488023#M90829</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Based on bleeding snort sid, this is what I've got, but it doesn't seem to be working:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wmf exploit file:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;\x01\x00\x09\x00\x00\x03.{10}\x00\x00.{0, 5000}\x26\x06\x09\x00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488023#M90829</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmoulder16</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:49:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone come up with a custom sig for WMF Exploit?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488024#M90830</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Signature 5693-1 which was released in S210 addresses this vulnerability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488024#M90830</guid>
      <dc:creator>craiwill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-12-29T21:45:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone come up with a custom sig for WMF Exploit?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488025#M90831</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I installed release S211 (modified 5693-1 signature) and attempted to download an WMF file across the sensor, but the signature did not fire.  What causes the WMF signature to fire?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 15:49:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488025#M90831</guid>
      <dc:creator>tami.martin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-04T15:49:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone come up with a custom sig for WMF Exploit?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488026#M90832</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This signature fires upon detecting a malicious wmf file downloaded from a web server running on a port specified in the #WEBPORTS variable. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/anyone-come-up-with-a-custom-sig-for-wmf-exploit/m-p/488026#M90832</guid>
      <dc:creator>craiwill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-04T16:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

