<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA 5540 subinterface issue in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5540-subinterface-issue/m-p/1117135#M913486</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a similar change on a ASA5510 last week. I changed a physical interface to subinterfaces. Then I found all the all the statics and NAT associated with the physical int were removed from the config. This may explain why your colleague couldn't access them from the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>markjoblin7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-08T01:13:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA 5540 subinterface issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5540-subinterface-issue/m-p/1117134#M913478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not very familiar with firewalls, but I've inherited a network with an active/standby 5540 configuration. It looks like the 0/3 interface on the standby firewall is bad, so I recently tried to move the subinterfaces on that interface to the 0/2 interface. (They each only have 3 subifs, and there shouldn't be bandwidth concerns, as there's a bottleneck upstream.) When I did this in a management window (performing the change on the active firewall, and allowing it to replicate to the standby), I changed the subinterface numbers to match their associated VLAN numbers, for both the existing and the migrated subifs on the 0/2 interface. I was able to ping servers on all VLANs from the firewall, but a colleague trying to get in from outside was unable to access them. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other than the subinterface numbering, and the physical interface on which they reside, nothing in the firewall configuration changed. I don't understand why this would work one way, and not the other. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice I get would be appreciated. I'll do my best to answer any questions.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:39:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5540-subinterface-issue/m-p/1117134#M913478</guid>
      <dc:creator>angrynetguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:39:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA 5540 subinterface issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5540-subinterface-issue/m-p/1117135#M913486</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a similar change on a ASA5510 last week. I changed a physical interface to subinterfaces. Then I found all the all the statics and NAT associated with the physical int were removed from the config. This may explain why your colleague couldn't access them from the outside.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-5540-subinterface-issue/m-p/1117135#M913486</guid>
      <dc:creator>markjoblin7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-08T01:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

