<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA Lan &amp; statful failover on subinterfaces in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061111#M915862</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do you mean "falling short on the physical interfaces"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just make sure you've used standby IP's on any interface with a regular IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-28T14:23:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA Lan &amp; statful failover on subinterfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061110#M915861</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone of you guys configured Lan &amp;amp; stateful failover interface on a single physical interface with two subinterfaces dedicated for each?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am configuring 5520's in an Active/Standby mode and falling short on the physical interfaces...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pls advise or refer any cisco documentation regarding the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061110#M915861</guid>
      <dc:creator>csco11049253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:21:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Lan &amp; statful failover on subinterfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061111#M915862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what do you mean "falling short on the physical interfaces"?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just make sure you've used standby IP's on any interface with a regular IP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061111#M915862</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-28T14:23:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA Lan &amp; statful failover on subinterfaces</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061112#M915863</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You dont need to make any sub-interfaces. Just use the same 'physical' interface for both failover and stateful links. It works as long as your state traffic does not overwhelm the bandwidth of the interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Farrukh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:07:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-lan-statful-failover-on-subinterfaces/m-p/1061112#M915863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farrukh Haroon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-28T18:07:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

