<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN tunnel down due to no traffic in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030948#M916184</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Roni,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Check the interesting traffic ACL in site A and make sure the traffic from that particular VLAN to remote site is defined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-23T12:10:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN tunnel down due to no traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030947#M916181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a VPN tunnel (over the Internet) between two of our sites.  This morning access from site A to site was down but only for one particular vlan.  The tunnel was still up, vlans in site A were able to communicate with vlans in site B with the exception of one vlan in site B. Site  A was unable to ping this vlan on site B.  However, as soon as I ran an extended ping from the core switch of site B from that particular vlan, the communication for that vlan was suddenly established.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This tunnel is up for at least 7 months now and I never had this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking that the tunnel will only be up if traffic is initiated from site B, is that possible?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030947#M916181</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronshuster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:18:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN tunnel down due to no traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030948#M916184</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Roni,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Check the interesting traffic ACL in site A and make sure the traffic from that particular VLAN to remote site is defined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030948#M916184</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T12:10:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN tunnel down due to no traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030949#M916187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact the first thing I checked is to ensure the ACL is still there.  Nothing changed on that end, again, as soon as I initiated traffic from site B from that vlan (using an extended ping from the switch), it all came up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am 100% certain that the config did not change as I am the only person who has access to this equipment. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030949#M916187</guid>
      <dc:creator>ronshuster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T12:14:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN tunnel down due to no traffic</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030950#M916191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; 1) It is a possibility that you may have been running with a missing Interesting traffic statement for months and remote site or a host defined in your Interesting traffic was initiating the traffic but not that particular VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 2)  Another possibility is, an initiation might have been started by your site first, and an SA negotiation got hung due to x factors, and now whenever your site tries an initiation, that active SA is used for rekeying. Reloading the device or clearing all active isakmp and IPSEC SAs may resolve the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; 3)  Last possibility for cases in which one end can initiate but other end cant is isakmp or ipsec security-association lifetime mismatch. Maybe you did not change it but remote and migh have done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  If you have access to ASDM running syslog, set the ASDM logging level to 5, then try initiating traffic from that VLAN. If you see a single blue line (I cant remember the phrase) that indicates case 2 above. If nothing happens, that means an interesting traffic issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:34:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-tunnel-down-due-to-no-traffic/m-p/1030950#M916191</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-23T12:34:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

