<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load Balancing Configuration. in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971030#M916699</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;??? Still waiting response..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-16T06:37:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balancing Configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971025#M916669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have Two ASA Fw and two different ISP leased lines. Now I want to create VPN tunnel site to site with DC and it will work. Its fine. Now I want to use both ASA and both ISP lines will be use for both ASA boxes and I will create the Tunnel. Now if I connect my inside network with both firewall then will it work? I want load balancing between ISP links and load Balancing of VPN tunnel. The configuration is in below:-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW 1 outside interface 1.1.1.1/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW 1 Inside  Interface 192.168.12.1/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW 2 Outside interface 2.2.2.2/24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FW 2 Inside  Interface 192.168.12.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if I assign the gateway 192.168.12.1 on client machines then traffic moves from FW1 and if I use 192.168.12.2 then traffic will move from second Fw. Now I want the traffic will use both interface and 50-50 % traffic could divert. Is it possible then please tell us what shd i do? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:14:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971025#M916669</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:14:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971026#M916673</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone respond?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971026#M916673</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-15T18:37:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971027#M916681</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:46:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971027#M916681</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-15T18:46:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971028#M916685</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, am i thinking wrong??? Please suggest..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971028#M916685</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-15T20:02:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971029#M916693</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971029#M916693</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-15T21:52:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing Configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971030#M916699</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;??? Still waiting response..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:37:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/load-balancing-configuration/m-p/971030#M916699</guid>
      <dc:creator>nikuhappy2010</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-16T06:37:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

