<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SDM Predefined Policy?? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937545#M917715</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using SDM for the first time to set up a 871 router.  There is a predfined policy that just seems counter intuitive.  It is found in the Firewall and ACL section and is called sdm-permit. It is applied from the out-zone to self.  This is the confusing part the Action is Drop.  I'm guessing that this is just a semantics thing, but when I see a policy nanmed Permit I naturally think that it is going to pass traffic and not drop it.  Does anybody else find this confusing or do I just not understand Cisco terminology?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:04:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ccsmith705</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:04:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDM Predefined Policy??</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937545#M917715</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using SDM for the first time to set up a 871 router.  There is a predfined policy that just seems counter intuitive.  It is found in the Firewall and ACL section and is called sdm-permit. It is applied from the out-zone to self.  This is the confusing part the Action is Drop.  I'm guessing that this is just a semantics thing, but when I see a policy nanmed Permit I naturally think that it is going to pass traffic and not drop it.  Does anybody else find this confusing or do I just not understand Cisco terminology?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:04:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937545#M917715</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccsmith705</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T13:04:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDM Predefined Policy??</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937546#M917716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, what you describe is confusing.  My recommendation, based on my [thankfully] limited experience with the 800 series, is to avoid SDM do to limitations and use the command line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-JD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 02:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937546#M917716</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdlampard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-26T02:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDM Predefined Policy??</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937547#M917717</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply JD.  I think I'll take your advice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/sdm-predefined-policy/m-p/937547#M917717</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccsmith705</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-26T16:08:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

