<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic TLS Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Logjam Vulnerability in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/tls-diffie-hellman-key-exchange-logjam-vulnerability/m-p/2707294#M918167</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have Cisco Security Manager 4.8 running on Windows Server 2008 R2, recently we have conducted a scan on the server, and the following vulnerability has been reported &amp;nbsp;"TLS Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Logjam Vulnerability". Note that we have excluded weak ciphers !EXPORT from httpd.conf file and rerun scan but vulnerability still exists.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it related to OpenSSL version that comes integrated with CSM? How can this be mitigated?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Omar Khouli</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T13:30:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TLS Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Logjam Vulnerability</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/tls-diffie-hellman-key-exchange-logjam-vulnerability/m-p/2707294#M918167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have Cisco Security Manager 4.8 running on Windows Server 2008 R2, recently we have conducted a scan on the server, and the following vulnerability has been reported &amp;nbsp;"TLS Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange Logjam Vulnerability". Note that we have excluded weak ciphers !EXPORT from httpd.conf file and rerun scan but vulnerability still exists.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it related to OpenSSL version that comes integrated with CSM? How can this be mitigated?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:30:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/tls-diffie-hellman-key-exchange-logjam-vulnerability/m-p/2707294#M918167</guid>
      <dc:creator>Omar Khouli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T13:30:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I have recently run into what</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/tls-diffie-hellman-key-exchange-logjam-vulnerability/m-p/2707295#M918170</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have recently run into what sounds like a similar problem on a different platform. In our case it seems to be an issue about using Diffie-Hellman group 2 which uses 1024 bits. I wonder if that is the case with your platform also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rick&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;OBJECT cotype="cs" id="SILOBFWOBJECTID" style="width: 0px; height: 0px; display: block;" type="cosymantecnisbfw"&gt;&lt;/OBJECT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/tls-diffie-hellman-key-exchange-logjam-vulnerability/m-p/2707295#M918170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard Burts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-16T15:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

