topic Ok we are using NPS, but was in Network Security https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615166#M920432 <P>Ok we are using NPS, but was thrown off by the word "automated".</P> Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:56:08 GMT Steven Williams 2015-02-24T21:56:08Z Meeting a PCI requirement https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615164#M920430 <P align="LEFT" dir="LTR"><SPAN lang="EN">7.1.4 </SPAN></P><P align="LEFT" dir="LTR"><SPAN lang="EN">Are access controls implemented via an automated access control system? </SPAN></P><P align="LEFT" dir="LTR">&nbsp;</P><P align="LEFT" dir="LTR"><SPAN lang="EN">How is everyone achieving this? Is this something ACS can do? I totally cannot fork over the money for ISE but trying to figure out what PCI DSS really wants with this?</SPAN></P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:23:38 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615164#M920430 Steven Williams 2020-02-21T13:23:38Z ACS and ISE can both do it, https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615165#M920431 <P>ACS and ISE can both do it, but so can Microsoft NPS and FreeRadius. What PCI wants is for authentication to be centralized and controlled with least privileges.&nbsp;</P><P>http://blog.skufel.net/2012/06/how-to-integrating-cisco-devices-access-with-microsoft-npsradius/</P> Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:11:55 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615165#M920431 Collin Clark 2015-02-12T15:11:55Z Ok we are using NPS, but was https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615166#M920432 <P>Ok we are using NPS, but was thrown off by the word "automated".</P> Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:56:08 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/meeting-a-pci-requirement/m-p/2615166#M920432 Steven Williams 2015-02-24T21:56:08Z