<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FirePOWER DOS attack Test Scenario in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-dos-attack-test-scenario/m-p/3386354#M921444</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who wanted to see FirePOWER FMC events in action based of a couple of test scenario's.&amp;nbsp; We decided to connect upstream from their FirePOWER device and run some test attacks from a laptop.&amp;nbsp; For one of the test, we used HPING3 to initiate a Denial of Service attack on the firewall's external IP and also on a server that was NAT'd to the outside.&amp;nbsp; In both instances, we saw that the traffic was not seen as an attack and was permitted through the firewall.&amp;nbsp; What should we have expected?&amp;nbsp; Is a single laptop attacking using HPING3 not enough?&amp;nbsp; It took us running a "Hail Mary" scan from Kali Linux before we were able to generate anything to show up as an attack.&amp;nbsp; I would have expected to have seen more things blocked.&amp;nbsp; Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua_Engels</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:47:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FirePOWER DOS attack Test Scenario</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-dos-attack-test-scenario/m-p/3386354#M921444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a customer who wanted to see FirePOWER FMC events in action based of a couple of test scenario's.&amp;nbsp; We decided to connect upstream from their FirePOWER device and run some test attacks from a laptop.&amp;nbsp; For one of the test, we used HPING3 to initiate a Denial of Service attack on the firewall's external IP and also on a server that was NAT'd to the outside.&amp;nbsp; In both instances, we saw that the traffic was not seen as an attack and was permitted through the firewall.&amp;nbsp; What should we have expected?&amp;nbsp; Is a single laptop attacking using HPING3 not enough?&amp;nbsp; It took us running a "Hail Mary" scan from Kali Linux before we were able to generate anything to show up as an attack.&amp;nbsp; I would have expected to have seen more things blocked.&amp;nbsp; Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-dos-attack-test-scenario/m-p/3386354#M921444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua_Engels</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:47:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FirePOWER DOS attack Test Scenario</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-dos-attack-test-scenario/m-p/3389238#M921445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How is the Rate-Based Attack Prevention configured ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 13:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-dos-attack-test-scenario/m-p/3389238#M921445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bogdan Nita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-25T13:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

