<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CSM 4.0.1 adds multiple DM_INLINE_NETWORK objects in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csm-4-0-1-adds-multiple-dm-inline-network-objects/m-p/1693146#M922382</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when we add a ASA 8.3 to CSM 4.0.1, the ruleset gets totally messed up because CSM seems to get confused about certain object groups:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSM uses DM_INLINE_NETWORK_xx instead of some real group names, even adds multiple DM_INLINE_NETWORK_xx entries for the same object group depending on how often it is used in ACLs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is CSM not able to deal with all kinds of object group names or what can be the reason for this behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Uli&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>saurbechtle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:22:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CSM 4.0.1 adds multiple DM_INLINE_NETWORK objects</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csm-4-0-1-adds-multiple-dm-inline-network-objects/m-p/1693146#M922382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when we add a ASA 8.3 to CSM 4.0.1, the ruleset gets totally messed up because CSM seems to get confused about certain object groups:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CSM uses DM_INLINE_NETWORK_xx instead of some real group names, even adds multiple DM_INLINE_NETWORK_xx entries for the same object group depending on how often it is used in ACLs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is CSM not able to deal with all kinds of object group names or what can be the reason for this behaviour?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Uli&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csm-4-0-1-adds-multiple-dm-inline-network-objects/m-p/1693146#M922382</guid>
      <dc:creator>saurbechtle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CSM 4.0.1 adds multiple DM_INLINE_NETWORK objects</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csm-4-0-1-adds-multiple-dm-inline-network-objects/m-p/1693147#M922383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0pt; margin: 0pt;"&gt;Sorry, I was wrong, it is different: we have created ACLs containing several single objects as source and/or destination...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0pt; margin: 0pt;"&gt;Is it possible to prevent this or is CSM not able to deal with this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding: 0pt; margin: 0pt;"&gt;Tried to adjust options under Tools&amp;gt;CSM Administration&amp;gt;Deployment: unchecked 'Create Object Groups...'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="border-collapse: collapse; list-style-type: none;"&gt;Thanks and cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="border-collapse: collapse; list-style-type: none;"&gt;Uli&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/csm-4-0-1-adds-multiple-dm-inline-network-objects/m-p/1693147#M922383</guid>
      <dc:creator>saurbechtle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-09T15:47:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

