https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multi-tunneling/m-p/3877378#M923263 <P>hi , i have a situation. i am using vpn thats a different pool of network. (15.x.x.x) i tunneled it to the network which is regular lan network( 192.x.x.x).but there is a different vpn site to site which is a different address.(172.x.x.x) So , the problem is when i vpn , i am not able to reach the&nbsp; other site to site vpn(172.x.x.x). what can be the solution? please advise.&nbsp;</P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:14:03 GMT atulpalsinghsaini6492 2020-02-21T17:14:03Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multi-tunneling/m-p/3877378#M923263 <P>hi , i have a situation. i am using vpn thats a different pool of network. (15.x.x.x) i tunneled it to the network which is regular lan network( 192.x.x.x).but there is a different vpn site to site which is a different address.(172.x.x.x) So , the problem is when i vpn , i am not able to reach the&nbsp; other site to site vpn(172.x.x.x). what can be the solution? please advise.&nbsp;</P> Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:14:03 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multi-tunneling/m-p/3877378#M923263 atulpalsinghsaini6492 2020-02-21T17:14:03Z https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multi-tunneling/m-p/3877450#M923264 <P>Are you saying that you get to the first network via remote access VPN (AnyConnect) and then are unable to reach a network that site is also connected to via site-site VPN?</P> <P>If so, three things need to be in place:</P> <P>1. The VPN pool needs to be included in the site-site VPN definition (on both ends of the site-site VPN),</P> <P>2. A NAT statement for "outside,outside" needs to be in place, and</P> <P>3. The remote site must know to route the VPN pool traffic via the device terminating the VPN.</P> Fri, 21 Jun 2019 14:25:33 GMT https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/multi-tunneling/m-p/3877450#M923264 Marvin Rhoads 2019-06-21T14:25:33Z