<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Virtual FMC questions in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017031#M933914</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately HA is NOT available on Virtual FMC in the current version of FMC, so you could not run them as a pair. You'd have to run them independantly, which is less than ideal. I would reconsider purchasing physcial appliances.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-23T13:15:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual FMC questions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017024#M933913</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have mid size network for which I am planning to buy virtual FMCs as the physical FMC1000 that we have is going to be EOS soon. I have a pair of 4110s at edge and one 2110 for testing. I am going to add a pair of 4115 in the DC. I do not have IPS monitoring on any of the Firepower.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My first question is if I get two&amp;nbsp;SF-FMC-VMW-10-K9 for this setup do I run into the risk of performance and capacity? The reason I am getting two of these is because I want to share the load as I have read virtual FMCs can be sluggish if they receive slightly large volume of traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second question I had was regarding the 250 GB limit on the virtual FMC. Now I am not sure the 250 GB limit is&amp;nbsp; also related to any time period. Also I am not sure what happens when the 250 GB limit is reached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Without the IPS, I will have mainly connection events and I am hoping that two virtual FMCs can handle the load.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope my questions make sense and I can get some helpful responses and suggestions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017024#M933913</guid>
      <dc:creator>S891</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T17:51:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual FMC questions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017031#M933914</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;Unfortunately HA is NOT available on Virtual FMC in the current version of FMC, so you could not run them as a pair. You'd have to run them independantly, which is less than ideal. I would reconsider purchasing physcial appliances.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017031#M933914</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-23T13:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual FMC questions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017041#M933915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I am aware of this limitation of HA. I was planning to have one vFMC manage the 4115 and the other vFMC to manage 4110 and 2110. Running on vmware we can also do snapshot and recover.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4017041#M933915</guid>
      <dc:creator>S891</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-23T13:21:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual FMC questions</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4386780#M1080028</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just an update to the last year post. HA is now available for virtual FMC. I see this feature is available in ver 6.7.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/virtual-fmc-questions/m-p/4386780#M1080028</guid>
      <dc:creator>S891</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-14T11:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

