<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Zone-member security Question? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951284#M934956</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, If I configure on my router some sub-interfaces (let's say G0/0.2, g0/0.3, etc) and they belong to my inside network where should I apply the zone-member secury inside command? On the G0/0 or on each sub-interface that I have traffic to protect?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>csc010627097</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:40:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zone-member security Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951284#M934956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys, If I configure on my router some sub-interfaces (let's say G0/0.2, g0/0.3, etc) and they belong to my inside network where should I apply the zone-member secury inside command? On the G0/0 or on each sub-interface that I have traffic to protect?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951284#M934956</guid>
      <dc:creator>csc010627097</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T12:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zone-member security Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951285#M934957</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should be on the sub interfaces because each sub interfaces belong to different subnet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 04:16:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951285#M934957</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jennifer Halim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-01T04:16:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Zone-member security Question?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951286#M934959</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Bro&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I’ve understood from your question, you said that both the subinterfaces are catered for the inside users but I’m guessing they are assigned to different groups of users/vlans e.g. VLAN 10 for Users in Level 1, and VLAN 20 for User in Level 2 etc. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that’s the case, then I would apply the “zone-member security XXX” command on each of the sub interfaces. A sample is shown below;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class-map type inspect match-any CM_TEST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;match protocol tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;match protocol udp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;match protocol icmp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;policy-map type inspect PM_TEST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class type inspect CM_TEST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;inspect&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone security inside-vlan10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone security inside-vlan20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone-pair security ZP_TEST source inside-vlan10 destination inside-vlan20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;service-policy type inspect PM_TEST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0.10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;description – LAN Users in Level 1 --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone security inside-vlan10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;encapsulation dot1q 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/0.20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;description – LAN Users in Level 2 --&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zone security inside-vlan20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;encapsulation dot1q 20&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P/S: If you think this comment is useful, please do rate them nicely &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/zone-member-security-question/m-p/1951286#M934959</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ramraj Sivagnanam Sivajanam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-20T18:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

