<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Access list direction control in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-list-direction-control/m-p/1027770#M937954</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two unix servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Servers A : 10.10.10.2/ 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Servers B : 192.168.1.2 /24 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;connected to routers Fa0/0 and Fa 0/1 interfaces respectively.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have configured following access list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 101 deny 10.10.10.2 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 eq telnet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and applied as &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#inf fa0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;( config-if)#ip access-group 101 in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will deny telnet access initiated from 10.10.10.2 to server 192.168.1.2 as source , destinatio and target port numbers are matching. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What will happen if reverse telnet connection is initiated , that is telnet is initiated by 192.168.1.2 to 10.10.10.2 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it be denied by our access list ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As packet returning back to 192.168.1.2 will match the ip address but I think target port will be diferent and not 23 ) so connection shoud be established.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please share.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subodh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bapatsubodh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:43:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Access list direction control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-list-direction-control/m-p/1027770#M937954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two unix servers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Servers A : 10.10.10.2/ 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Servers B : 192.168.1.2 /24 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;connected to routers Fa0/0 and Fa 0/1 interfaces respectively.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have configured following access list&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 101 deny 10.10.10.2 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 eq telnet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;permit any any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and applied as &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;#inf fa0/0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;( config-if)#ip access-group 101 in&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This will deny telnet access initiated from 10.10.10.2 to server 192.168.1.2 as source , destinatio and target port numbers are matching. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What will happen if reverse telnet connection is initiated , that is telnet is initiated by 192.168.1.2 to 10.10.10.2 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it be denied by our access list ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As packet returning back to 192.168.1.2 will match the ip address but I think target port will be diferent and not 23 ) so connection shoud be established.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please share.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subodh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-list-direction-control/m-p/1027770#M937954</guid>
      <dc:creator>bapatsubodh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:43:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access list direction control</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-list-direction-control/m-p/1027771#M937958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subodh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think your access-list should read &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 101 deny tcp 10.10.10.2 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 eq telnet (note the "tcp" keyword).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway you are correct in what you say. The target port on the return traffic to 192.168.1.2 would not be 23 but a port number above 1024. So your access-list 101 would not block the traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 05:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/access-list-direction-control/m-p/1027771#M937958</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-12T05:29:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

