<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Active/Active firewall in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-active-firewall/m-p/949004#M939347</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;On an Active/Active firewall configuration with Standby addresses configured what will happen if the Active interface goes down? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our setup the firewall did not fail over. But it did fail over for the interfaces which did not have an IP address configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikedelafield</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:30:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active/Active firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-active-firewall/m-p/949004#M939347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On an Active/Active firewall configuration with Standby addresses configured what will happen if the Active interface goes down? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In our setup the firewall did not fail over. But it did fail over for the interfaces which did not have an IP address configured.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-active-firewall/m-p/949004#M939347</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikedelafield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active/Active firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-active-firewall/m-p/949005#M939350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA, FWSM? Routed, Transparent?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On FWSM, we use Active-Active in both routed and transparent. We use link-monitoring to determine which interfaces initiate a failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will not work with 2 FWSMs in the same chassis, because the VLAN-interface only goes down when there are no other active ports. With 2 FWSMs in that VLAN, the interface does not go down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When in different chassis, make sure only one port on the switch is in that VLAN (only int vlan x *OR* switchport access VLAN x, but not both), otherwise the link will not fail on the FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:57:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/active-active-firewall/m-p/949005#M939350</guid>
      <dc:creator>mvandorp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-15T08:57:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

