<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Resquence ports in Pix service object-group? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/1000000#M939719</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may have to plan a change , the esiest way is to simply from a notepad text editor prepare the script copy and past it in firewall,  I see no other way to no cause seconds disruption, if say you create another new object-group with proper sequencing you still will need to change the access lists mapped to old  object-group to new object-group thus causing also disruption not to mention how many access-lists are using the old object-group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-05T01:52:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Resquence ports in Pix service object-group?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/999997#M939716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Say I have..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service PORT-Web-App tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6400&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 8800&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;..and a few days later I configure &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;conf t&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service PORT-Web-App tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 4000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the result is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service PORT-Web-App tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6400&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 8800&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 4000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to resequence the object so it would appear like this in the config?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service PORT-Web-App tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 4000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6400&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6500&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 8800&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:27:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/999997#M939716</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmedwid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:27:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resquence ports in Pix service object-group?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/999998#M939717</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you can.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service PORT-Web-App tcp &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no port-object eq 6400&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no port-object eq 6500 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no port-object eq 8800 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no port-object eq 4000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no port-object eq 6100 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 4000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6100 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6400 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 6500 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;port-object eq 8800 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:18:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/999998#M939717</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-05T01:18:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resquence ports in Pix service object-group?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/999999#M939718</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well fair enough.  Guess I have to be more specific.  &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;  Removing ports temporarily would run the risk of interrupting conversations passing through the device.  Is there any non-destructive way to sequence the service object group?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:26:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/999999#M939718</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmedwid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-05T01:26:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resquence ports in Pix service object-group?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/1000000#M939719</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may have to plan a change , the esiest way is to simply from a notepad text editor prepare the script copy and past it in firewall,  I see no other way to no cause seconds disruption, if say you create another new object-group with proper sequencing you still will need to change the access lists mapped to old  object-group to new object-group thus causing also disruption not to mention how many access-lists are using the old object-group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/1000000#M939719</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-05T01:52:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Resquence ports in Pix service object-group?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/1000001#M939720</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This solution is a very simple one:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Original:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service test tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8080&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8081&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8082&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list External extended permit icmp any any log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list External extended permit tcp any any object-group test log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now you want to re-arrange so that it will look something WITHOUT disrupting the traffics:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service test tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8080&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8081&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8082&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what you will do is this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1- create a temp group-object:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service temp tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8080&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8081&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8082&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2- put this group-object inside test group:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group service test tcp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; group-object temp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3- Now remove the following lines inside test:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 8080&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 8081&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 8082&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no port-object eq 8000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 21&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8080&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8081&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; port-object eq 8082&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no group-object temp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will NOT disrupt any live traffics and&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;achieving your requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the reason why I hate Pix.  A very &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;complicate and stupid way of doing something very simple as this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE Security&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 03:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/resquence-ports-in-pix-service-object-group/m-p/1000001#M939720</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-05T03:27:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

