<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pix and routing without natting? in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941677#M940211</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have nat-control enabled, you will need to NAT between the interfaces.  If not, and ACL allowing the outside device to the internal router should suffice.  You will need the ACL either way.  Make sure you use the correct IPs in the ACL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>derrickc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-28T13:25:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix and routing without natting?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941676#M940210</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a host in a lower sec that needs access to a router in a higher sec.   I have an acl and routing to the inside for the destination network.  Do i need to use a static nat for this?  I also tryed to create a static nat to the router.  But that didnt work. thanks all&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941676#M940210</guid>
      <dc:creator>starmantwo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix and routing without natting?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941677#M940211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have nat-control enabled, you will need to NAT between the interfaces.  If not, and ACL allowing the outside device to the internal router should suffice.  You will need the ACL either way.  Make sure you use the correct IPs in the ACL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941677#M940211</guid>
      <dc:creator>derrickc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-28T13:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix and routing without natting?</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941678#M940212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah i don't have nat-control disable. But can you create a static nat to a inside router.  And use the static nat within a host to get to another network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-and-routing-without-natting/m-p/941678#M940212</guid>
      <dc:creator>starmantwo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-28T15:33:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

