<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: policy nat vs. statics in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030955#M941230</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you for the fast answer! I agree with your opinion, but I have no other interface defined in any global statement regarding nat id 13...?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gadpharns</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-11T11:06:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>policy nat vs. statics</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030953#M941226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could u give me some advise for the following issue:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (dmz) 13 access-list nat-dmz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;global (internet) 13 194.x.x.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list nat-dmz permit tcp host 10.88.x.x gt 1023 any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt; a normal policy Nat statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and I also have a static:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (dmz,internet) 194.x.x.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.88.x.x netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder why the hit counter of the acl is increasing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list nat-dmz permit tcp host 10.88.x.x gt 1023 any (hitcnt=278)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why does the nat statement match??! I thougth statics match before policy nat. Can you explain that to me, please?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:15:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030953#M941226</guid>
      <dc:creator>gadpharns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:15:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: policy nat vs. statics</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030954#M941228</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you're absolutely correct,policy nat is below static in terms of order of operation &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   static (1st preference)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       a) static nat with and without access-list (first match)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       b) static pat with and without access-list (first match)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; nat (2nd preference)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;       a) nat &lt;ID&gt; access-list (first match)&lt;/ID&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However in your case the static would only take effect if you go to interface "internet"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your traffic is destined for any  other interface (other than internet) then the access-list nat-dmz comes into play which says&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list nat-dmz permit tcp host 10.88.x.x gt 1023 "any"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you see a hit count for that traffic on this ACL &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030954#M941228</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T09:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: policy nat vs. statics</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030955#M941230</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you for the fast answer! I agree with your opinion, but I have no other interface defined in any global statement regarding nat id 13...?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030955#M941230</guid>
      <dc:creator>gadpharns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T11:06:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: policy nat vs. statics</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030956#M941232</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;from the internal host y.y.y.y ping 4.2.2.2 and get me the following :-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cl xlate loc y.y.y.y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ping 4.2.2.2 or yahoo.com and get me &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh xlate det | inc y.y.y.y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh xlate loc y.y.y.y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to see to which IP address is this y.y.y.y getting xlated ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the other thing..whats the code on Pix/ASA ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030956#M941232</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T15:56:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: policy nat vs. statics</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030957#M941235</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi abinjola,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;unfortunately this server is in use .. when I enter "cl xlate loc y.y.y.y" all associated connections are killed?! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current "show xlate local 10.88.x.x" shows&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Global 194.x.x.x Local 10.88.x.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this the xlate for the static? A similar nat configuration looks more like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PAT Global 194.x.x.x (51953) Local 10.88.x.x(63945)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its a FWSM with 2.3.3.2 Software. Thanks for your help!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:14:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030957#M941235</guid>
      <dc:creator>gadpharns</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T20:14:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: policy nat vs. statics</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030958#M941236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;can you get a schedule downtime of 5 min. to run our tests ..?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;change the public ip in static or in NAT ACL and initiate the traffic , collect the above output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could be a bug, can't say at this point unless I get the output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/policy-nat-vs-statics/m-p/1030958#M941236</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-12T09:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

