<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interface failover on single ASA in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022214#M941273</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have 1 ASA firewall and 2 LAN switches. Can it be configured that the ASA connects in to both switches and in the event of switch failure connection to the firewall is still possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 4 interfaces on the ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mikedelafield</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:14:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interface failover on single ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022214#M941273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have 1 ASA firewall and 2 LAN switches. Can it be configured that the ASA connects in to both switches and in the event of switch failure connection to the firewall is still possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have 4 interfaces on the ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022214#M941273</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikedelafield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:14:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface failover on single ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022215#M941274</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot do this as the ASA will not allow to have the same IP subnet on 2 of its interfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you need redundancy, then you require one more ASA box which can be configured for failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Narayan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022215#M941274</guid>
      <dc:creator>royalblues</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T10:45:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface failover on single ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022216#M941277</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;originally I didn't think it was possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but i found a document relating to Redundant Interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wp1045838" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wp1045838&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has anyone used this succesfully?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i know its a strange configuration, but it is a requirement we have on 1 of our sites&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022216#M941277</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikedelafield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T12:24:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface failover on single ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022217#M941280</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;originally I didn't think it was possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but i found a document relating to Redundant Interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wp1045838" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa80/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wp1045838&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;has anyone used this succesfully?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i know its a strange configuration, but it is a requirement we have on 1 of our sites&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:20:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022217#M941280</guid>
      <dc:creator>mikedelafield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-10T14:20:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interface failover on single ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022218#M941281</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That requires V8 code, which is still very early. I don't know that i'd be using it on a production system just yet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/interface-failover-on-single-asa/m-p/1022218#M941281</guid>
      <dc:creator>chris.rosan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-03-11T03:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

