<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replacing standby failover ASA in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409136#M952328</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Since it is the secondary unit, it should pick up all the configuration from the primary (currently active) unit. So just the failover configuration and any files that need to be uploaded on to the flash (anyconnect, hostscan images etc.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rahul Govindan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-02T15:11:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replacing standby failover ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409124#M952327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have two ASA firewalls in an active-passive standby arrangement. The secondary unit had a hardware failure and needs to be replaced.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I configure the replacement, do I need to put the ENTIRE running configuration on it and set it to "failover lan unit secondary"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or do I simply need to configure the failover ink, set the system to "failover lan unit secondary" and cable it up? (with the idea that the primary then syncs the config to the standby)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409124#M952327</guid>
      <dc:creator>Colin Higgins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:56:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing standby failover ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409136#M952328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since it is the secondary unit, it should pick up all the configuration from the primary (currently active) unit. So just the failover configuration and any files that need to be uploaded on to the flash (anyconnect, hostscan images etc.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409136#M952328</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rahul Govindan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-02T15:11:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replacing standby failover ASA</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409141#M952329</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;You at least need to configure the interfaces, enable failover and define "failover lan unit secondary". The configuration will then sync from the Active ASA. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2018 15:18:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replacing-standby-failover-asa/m-p/3409141#M952329</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Ingram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-02T15:18:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

