<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automatically after reboot in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830048#M955192</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used nat0 command to transfer outside ip address directly to inside users.But whenever my pix reboots &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (Interface) access-list 100 command erase automatically&amp;amp; i will have to reconfigure it every time by changing access list name .Please guide me to resolve it permentaly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manik.palekar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:01:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automatically after reboot</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830048#M955192</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used nat0 command to transfer outside ip address directly to inside users.But whenever my pix reboots &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;nat (Interface) access-list 100 command erase automatically&amp;amp; i will have to reconfigure it every time by changing access list name .Please guide me to resolve it permentaly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830048#M955192</guid>
      <dc:creator>manik.palekar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:01:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830049#M955193</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you make this configuration via ASDM ? are those host/network being named ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what version you running ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:38:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830049#M955193</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T13:38:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830050#M955194</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hi ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i did it by console..version 7.1 is used.i didnt get your 2nd point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sample config...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# nat (inside) 0 access-list 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;# access-list 100 permit ip any 145.xx.xx.xx &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830050#M955194</guid>
      <dc:creator>manik.palekar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-13T13:19:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830051#M955195</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;looks like a bug to me..is upgrade possible for you ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:51:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830051#M955195</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-13T14:51:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830052#M955196</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's the price you pay for running Early &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Deployment (ED) code.  These are 'beta' code&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as far as I am concerned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question is: is downgrade possible for you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should be running 7.0(7) because it is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;General Deployment (GD) code.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE Security&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830052#M955196</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-13T15:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830053#M955197</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would suggest for an upgrade to 7.2.3 which is quite stable and was an end to all the 7.2.x interims.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:21:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830053#M955197</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-13T15:21:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830054#M955198</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is version 7.2(3) ED or GD?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would STRONGLY recommed staying from any&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ED code.  They are just not stable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my 2c.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830054#M955198</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-13T15:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: nat (interface) 0 access-list 100 command erase automaticall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830055#M955199</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;hello Requester..7.0.3 doesn't support many features like U-turning of clear text traffic,PPOE,and many other...you are safe to to go 7.2.3 as this was a dead end for all interims on 7.2.x and has been quite stable...if you want to go to 7.0.7 (GD) you will loose many feature set..choice is yours.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:04:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/nat-interface-0-access-list-100-command-erase-automatically/m-p/830055#M955199</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-13T16:04:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

