<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826294#M955239</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 5 cents for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why don't you configure glbp on your routers? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Didn't test but looks like a simplest solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>m.volodko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-12T21:18:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826291#M955232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    I have a few questions on load balancing OUTGOING internet traffic through the ASA5540 firewall running code version 7.2. My company has 2 internet links going to the same ISP and the firewalls are running in active/standby mode. I would like to load balance OUTGOING internet traffic through 2 different edge routers. The outside interface of the firewall and the internal interface of both edge routers are on the same subnet. Here's a quick diagram of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my setup:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;	----------------&amp;gt;Router A --&amp;gt;internet connection A, same ISP as B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;asa5540&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;		----------------&amp;gt;Router B --&amp;gt;internet connection B, same ISP as A&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can I use 2 static routes on the ASA5540 to do outgoing load balancing? If so, is there a way to configure the firewall to track internet link failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Code 7.x supports OSPF and RIP. If I use OSPF, is it recommended to inject a default route through both edge routers into my internal network to do load balancing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. What is the recommended way to configure outgoing load balancing with dual internet links going to the same ISP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:01:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826291#M955232</guid>
      <dc:creator>dd99onedd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:01:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826292#M955234</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;--you cannot configure load balancing on ASA &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It cannot have two default gateway to route/load balance/traffic-shape at the same time&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though ISP fall back is supported :-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/examples.html#wp1038632" target="_blank"&gt;http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/examples.html#wp1038632&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--Place a small scale 1841 upstream to your ASA, to load balance your traffic point the entire traffic from ASA to the router and on 1841 you may do a policy based routing or load balancing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:08:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826292#M955234</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T14:08:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826293#M955238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for da HIGH 5 !!!;-)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826293#M955238</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T16:34:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826294#M955239</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 5 cents for this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why don't you configure glbp on your routers? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Didn't test but looks like a simplest solution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:18:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826294#M955239</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.volodko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T21:18:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826295#M955240</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;5 cents ?..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;..NO !! GLBP is not a feasible solution here..Gateway Load Balancing Protocol feature provides automatic router backup for IP hosts configured with a single default gateway on an IEEE 802.3 LAN....just like VRRP/HSRP..moreover not supported on 1800 series&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are not looking for router backup failure...we are looking for load sharing rather&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:33:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826295#M955240</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T21:33:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826296#M955241</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Difference between hsrp and glbp that instead of   hsrp, glbp can operate like active/active solution. Well, can be useful for this. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I see in feature navigator 1800 series supports glbp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Requester, you can check this links:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6600/product_data_sheet0900aecd803a546c.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6554/ps6600/product_data_sheet0900aecd803a546c.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6550/prod_presentation0900aecd801790a3_ps6600_Products_Presentation.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6550/prod_presentation0900aecd801790a3_ps6600_Products_Presentation.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is noticed that 18xx not supported, but in feature navigator i see different info. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826296#M955241</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.volodko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T21:47:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826297#M955244</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;1800 series not supporting GLBP :-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/ft_glbp.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/ft_glbp.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826297#M955244</guid>
      <dc:creator>abinjola</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T21:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Outgoing load balancing with dual ISP</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826298#M955248</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I said, in documents noticed that 18xx not support glbp, but in feature navigator I see:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/4702/fnglbphc9.jpg" target="_blank"&gt;http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/4702/fnglbphc9.jpg&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any way, why did you decide that requester has 18xx routers? In original post it doesn't mentioned. He has just one asa5540 and two of "who knows" routers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:08:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/outgoing-load-balancing-with-dual-isp/m-p/826298#M955248</guid>
      <dc:creator>m.volodko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-12T22:08:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

