<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASDM issue in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916148#M955344</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi every one, and thank you for your replies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact i found a bug describing the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it is CSCsg80786.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They say the workaround is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Delete the additional copies of the object groups created automatically by ASDM"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>costin.vilcu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-09-19T05:04:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASDM issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916144#M955328</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is a spookie one:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a ..let's say..friend, who says that if he tries to create a new object group using ASDM, instead of the new object-group (let's say GROUP_A) he gets also the GROUP_Areal1, GROUP_Areal2 and GROUP_Areal3, all of them containing some of the objects (not all) from the original GROUP_A group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He has an 5520 and is using 7.0(6) and also has about at least 50 object-groups created, all togheter with more than 1000 entries.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i tried to reproduce it on a 5520 with 7.2.(3), but i had no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916144#M955328</guid>
      <dc:creator>costin.vilcu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T12:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASDM issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916145#M955333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;your friend needs to upgrade his code  to 7.2(6)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:00:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916145#M955333</guid>
      <dc:creator>whisperwind</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-08T18:00:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASDM issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916146#M955337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My friend is running into the same issue.  Can he remove the extra object groups without effecting connectivity?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916146#M955337</guid>
      <dc:creator>sansari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-18T18:13:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASDM issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916147#M955340</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That I'm not sure of. An easy way to test is to create a new object-group, put in a few members, then create an access-list rule that refers to the object-group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Delete the object-group, see if the access-list still has the entries from the members of the object-group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's an easy test.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916147#M955340</guid>
      <dc:creator>jj27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-18T18:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASDM issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916148#M955344</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi every one, and thank you for your replies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact i found a bug describing the problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it is CSCsg80786.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They say the workaround is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Delete the additional copies of the object groups created automatically by ASDM"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916148#M955344</guid>
      <dc:creator>costin.vilcu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-19T05:04:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASDM issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916149#M955345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My situation is slightly different.  These objects where created by PDM, I just do not have enough flash to load ASDM on the box.  If you know of any issues with removing the extra object groups through cli, I appreciate a warning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 13:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asdm-issue/m-p/916149#M955345</guid>
      <dc:creator>sansari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-19T13:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

