<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FailOver problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-problem/m-p/873699#M955630</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 2 Pix 525 .it works as Active/Standby .in my case the Active is the secondry and the standby is the primary Pix. we use Failover cable and stateful failover together .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the Sync/Failover is working fine but&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i configured subinterfaces on the inside of the Active pix(Secondry) and issued the write memory  command on the Active ,the Syncronization failed  and both of them become active .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i removed the subinterfaces config and configured ACL or anything else the Failover process works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Help Pls?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Welcome&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:58:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>welcomeccie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:58:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FailOver problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-problem/m-p/873699#M955630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have 2 Pix 525 .it works as Active/Standby .in my case the Active is the secondry and the standby is the primary Pix. we use Failover cable and stateful failover together .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the Sync/Failover is working fine but&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i configured subinterfaces on the inside of the Active pix(Secondry) and issued the write memory  command on the Active ,the Syncronization failed  and both of them become active .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When i removed the subinterfaces config and configured ACL or anything else the Failover process works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Help Pls?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Welcome&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:58:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-problem/m-p/873699#M955630</guid>
      <dc:creator>welcomeccie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:58:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FailOver problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-problem/m-p/873700#M955632</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The failover configuration requires two identical security appliances connected to each other through a dedicated failover link and, optionally, a Stateful Failover link. The health of the active interfaces and units is monitored to determine if specific failover conditions are met. If those conditions are met, failover occurs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The security appliance supports two failover configurations, Active/Active failover and Active/Standby failover. Each failover configuration has its own method for determining and performing failover. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Active/Active failover, both units can pass network traffic. This lets you configure load balancing on your network. Active/Active failover is only available on units running in multiple context mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Active/Standby failover, only one unit passes traffic while the other unit waits in a standby state. Active/Standby failover is available on units running in either single or multiple context mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both failover configurations support stateful or stateless (regular) failover. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer to &lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1041883" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1041883&lt;/A&gt; for more information&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:02:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/failover-problem/m-p/873700#M955632</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbayuka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-11T15:02:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

