<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: asa/pix failover in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827328#M957175</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;They have to be the same model, if you are using PIX515E as primary, standby have to be PIX515E, cannot mixed them up with ASA/PIX for failover purposes..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-11T22:37:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>asa/pix failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827327#M957173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;can a pix failover to an asa or vice versa or do they have to be the same device.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827327#M957173</guid>
      <dc:creator>whanson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:47:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: asa/pix failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827328#M957175</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;They have to be the same model, if you are using PIX515E as primary, standby have to be PIX515E, cannot mixed them up with ASA/PIX for failover purposes..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827328#M957175</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-11T22:37:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: asa/pix failover</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827329#M957176</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;they must be identical...same model, same interfaces, same modules, same ram... same OS (you can run slightly different OS versions while doing an upgrade of the failover pair).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the only difference can be licensing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-pix-failover/m-p/827329#M957176</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-12T04:03:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

