<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Redundant ISP Links in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901774#M957445</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Policy-Based NAT seems to be the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mark.j.hodge</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-10T10:13:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Redundant ISP Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901773#M957444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have setup an ASA cluster to use Redundant ISP Links as show in the cisco example&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00806e880b.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This works fine for outbound traffic, i.e. web browsing.  However I would like to use it for inbound as well, connecting to a SMTP server.  As I understand it there cannot be two static mappings to the same IP address, from the two ISP CIDR ranges.  If I place a second IP address on the SMTP server to allow two mappings I cannot determine which address will be used as the source IP for outbound traffic. I believe this will screw up the connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas, assitance appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901773#M957444</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark.j.hodge</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redundant ISP Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901774#M957445</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Policy-Based NAT seems to be the answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:13:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901774#M957445</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark.j.hodge</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-10T10:13:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Redundant ISP Links</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901775#M957447</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, you need a service called DNS failover, if your primary link is down, your server will be resolved the secondary IP from the other ISP. Here's an exmple ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/s0306/prod/dnsfosm.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com/s0306/prod/dnsfosm.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/redundant-isp-links/m-p/901775#M957447</guid>
      <dc:creator>pengfang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-20T18:41:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

