<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pix multiple issues  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865794#M957804</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently running 7.2 on all my PIX's without problems - so maybe a good idea to upgrade....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fraser Reid</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-04T06:36:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865786#M957791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am runnnig 7.07 in pix 525 with the following problems :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.Cpu utilzation is extermely high. (52%)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I analyse the cpu profile will that incerase the utlization further?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.My pixes have failed and crash thread is fover_serial_rx and it is showing block memory exhaustion both count and low is showing 0 in the crash .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though there is a bug CSCsh32241 but it has been resolved in this code .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.My config is very big so if I use turbo ACl how will it impact the performance .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thnks in advance &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:56:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865786#M957791</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajbhatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-13T00:56:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865787#M957792</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was just expecting if some one has any ideas on this &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:18:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865787#M957792</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajbhatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T07:18:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865788#M957793</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;TurboACL  - do you have a large amount of ACL's in config - if yes then use turbo ACL 1 time to compile them - then it should run a little better (performance-wise)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CPU load - how much traffic is passing through the device ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;....just my thoughts on this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:07:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865788#M957793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fraser Reid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T10:07:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865789#M957794</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought I saw similar thread a while ago on this issue, you may want to do a search in security forum on high cpu pix 7.0, I believe mention of getting out of 7.0 and alteast use 7.2 as this version is much more statble, check bug tool database pertaining 7.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865789#M957794</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T14:14:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865790#M957796</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jorge,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do base this information on?  How do&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you determine that 7.2 is much more stable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;than version 7.0.7?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 7.0.7 is more stable than version&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;7.2 because 7.0.7 is GD while 7.2 is ED &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Early Deployment).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CCIE Security&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 14:37:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865790#M957796</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T14:37:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865791#M957798</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think my post was very clear ! based on reading threads and end user reports .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:43:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865791#M957798</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T17:43:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865792#M957800</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would have to agree with Jorge, as would most.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:45:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865792#M957800</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T17:45:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865793#M957802</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How would you explain the fact that 7.0(7) is &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GD while 7.2 is ED?  I was informed by Cisco &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TAC that GD is for General Deployment, means&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that this is very stable code release.  Early&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Deployment, ED, means the code in its early&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deployment phase and it is not as stable as&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;General Deployment.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am I wrong about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865793#M957802</guid>
      <dc:creator>cisco24x7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-03T18:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865794#M957804</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently running 7.2 on all my PIX's without problems - so maybe a good idea to upgrade....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865794#M957804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fraser Reid</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-04T06:36:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865795#M957805</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for ur replies &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would upgarde to 7.2.3 and see if anything good actaully comes from it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But it does have some bugs realted to 7.2.3 : memory problem &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and crash is due to block memory exhaution .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas on cpu profile activates ? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how does that impact cpu utilization &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:58:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865795#M957805</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajbhatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-04T10:58:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix multiple issues</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865796#M957806</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could any one throw any light on this :HIgh cpu on pix &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for sh process : I have an unusual reading on arp and dispatach unit .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   PC       SP       STATE       Runtime    SBASE     Stack Process&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lwe 00105f05 01191fa0 00ea5be0          0 01190018 8072/8192 block_diag&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mrd 0020d172 0177d140 00ea5c80  113745167 017751f8 27976/32768 Dispatch Unit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;M*  0073955b 0009feec 00ea5c80       1095 0638a5b0 25180/32768 accept/http&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mwe 00a73a19 0447fa38 00ea5b98         13 0447dac0 5740/8192 ssh/timer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; -     -        -         -     798544616    -         -     scheduler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; -     -        -         -     922889167    -         -     total elapsed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is sh blocks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result of the command: "sh blocks"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  SIZE    MAX    LOW    CNT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;     4    300    295    299&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;    80    116      0    116&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   256   3636   3476   3636&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is also an out put fron sh traffic ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do i need to upgarde the interfaces &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raj &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 06:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-multiple-issues/m-p/865796#M957806</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajbhatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-11T06:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

