<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: pix 7 static routing in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874632#M958931</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see. Please post the output of following commands&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh run route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packter-tracer input inside tcp anipaddressinside 3389 10.10.10.10 3389 detailed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-11T13:39:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>pix 7 static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874627#M958903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;- I have network 10.10.0.0/17 routed to int17&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- I want to route one addr, 10.10.10.10/32 to interface 32&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but traffic for 10.10.10.10 is sill going through int17. When I ping 10.10.10.10 from fw, it is routed ok.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;wtf is going on?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874627#M958903</guid>
      <dc:creator>dragec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:42:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 7 static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874628#M958907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure route for 10.10.10.10/32 has a lower metric than 10.10.0.0/17 route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  Please post the output of &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;  sh run route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:38:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874628#M958907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-11T12:38:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 7 static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874629#M958910</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;it has lower metric.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874629#M958910</guid>
      <dc:creator>dragec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-11T12:43:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 7 static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874630#M958914</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;try issuing following commands&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cl xlate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cl arp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cl route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874630#M958914</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-11T13:03:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 7 static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874631#M958922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;well it is plan B, system is in production, so I'd like to avoid this clear arp and clear xlate operation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:14:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874631#M958922</guid>
      <dc:creator>dragec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-11T13:14:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: pix 7 static routing</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874632#M958931</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see. Please post the output of following commands&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sh run route&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;packter-tracer input inside tcp anipaddressinside 3389 10.10.10.10 3389 detailed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-7-static-routing/m-p/874632#M958931</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Huseyin Kayahan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-11T13:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

