<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Transparent Firewall  in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812650#M964751</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In answer to your question yes you have 2 vlans but only one IP subnet. This setup is also used on other devices such as load balancers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason you need to do this is to avoid a spanning-tree loop. Assuming you are running PVST+ then having 2 vlans but only one subnet allows you to bridge the subnet with the FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-21T05:57:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Transparent Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812648#M964748</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have read the following definition a couple times:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Transparent mode, the FWSM acts like a "bump in the wire," or a "stealth firewall," and is not a router hop. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I understand with the previous sentence is that: The FWSM connects the same network on its inside and outside interfaces, but each interface must be on a different VLAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, are both vlans going to share same subnet???&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812648#M964748</guid>
      <dc:creator>lm20ele</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Transparent Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812649#M964750</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Transparent firewall will bridge between vlan and not route, so if you are using different subnets you will need layer 3 routing device to route packets between subnets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;~Rohit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:06:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812649#M964750</guid>
      <dc:creator>rochopra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-20T23:06:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Transparent Firewall</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812650#M964751</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In answer to your question yes you have 2 vlans but only one IP subnet. This setup is also used on other devices such as load balancers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason you need to do this is to avoid a spanning-tree loop. Assuming you are running PVST+ then having 2 vlans but only one subnet allows you to bridge the subnet with the FWSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/transparent-firewall/m-p/812650#M964751</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jon Marshall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-21T05:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

