<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P-P GRE Link in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081609#M965187</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use the DMVPN feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use the Router with Fixed IP as the DMVPN Hub and the Router with dynamic IP as the spoke.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DMVPN is based on GRE, However I would suggest to encrypt the GRE traffic using IPSEC, but this is not necessary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008014bcd7.shtml#conf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008014bcd7.shtml#conf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once the DMVPN tunnel is setup, you can route your IP subnets via this tunnel interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dhananjoy chowdhury</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-16T19:22:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P-P GRE Link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081607#M965175</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wish to route a public IP range from one provider across another providers backbone. I want to route this range statically via a GRE tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, the end-point (Customer spoke) is only DYNAMICALLY IP assigned a PUBLIC address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create a tunnel between the two sites, where one is dynamic, the other static and where I can route an IP range through this tunnel if the spoke IP end-point is unknown?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081607#M965175</guid>
      <dc:creator>cgravell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T10:58:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P-P GRE Link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081608#M965182</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at DMVPN (One Hub and One Spoke)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DMVPN uses NHRP to form spokes on the fly. The HUB does not need to know the public IP of the spokes at configuration time. The Tunnel/Public IP of the hub are hard coded in the spoke(s). Once it comes up the spoke registers itself to the hub dynamically (using the NHRP protocol).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Farrukh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:40:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081608#M965182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Farrukh Haroon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-14T12:40:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P-P GRE Link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081609#M965187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use the DMVPN feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use the Router with Fixed IP as the DMVPN Hub and the Router with dynamic IP as the spoke.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DMVPN is based on GRE, However I would suggest to encrypt the GRE traffic using IPSEC, but this is not necessary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-custom" href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008014bcd7.shtml#conf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a008014bcd7.shtml#conf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once the DMVPN tunnel is setup, you can route your IP subnets via this tunnel interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081609#M965187</guid>
      <dc:creator>dhananjoy chowdhury</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-16T19:22:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P-P GRE Link</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081610#M965190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the responses. I have used DMVPN since it was bleeding nose tech 4 or 5 years ago. I don't need to encrypt. The interface in this case is only p-p so I don't require a multi-point GRE interface (I remove that from the config). I guess my question is therefore, are there any other encap technologies that allow me to efficiently encap IP in IP without encryption to route a public IP range from one provider over another providers network? The caveat being that the spoke is dynamically assigned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone familiar with getVPN? Does this do this? Or is this pure crypto technology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 05:41:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/p-p-gre-link/m-p/1081610#M965190</guid>
      <dc:creator>cgravell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-17T05:41:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

