<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FirePower Flex Config in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3346732#M967286</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;My company is moving overhauling their entire network.&amp;nbsp; A part of this is that we are going from static routing to dynamic routing and moving from a ASA to a FirePower 2110 device.&amp;nbsp; The original design implementation for the dynamic routing was to use EIGRP.&amp;nbsp; The consultant helping to configure the FirePower explained that EIGRP was not compatible with the FMC and that now there is discussion to changing from that to OSPF.&amp;nbsp; After a bit of research I found that you can use the flex config option to use features that are available in the ASA in the FirePower environment.&amp;nbsp; My question is do you lose any functionality on the FirePower by implementing the flex config?&amp;nbsp; If we lose any of the functionality by implementing the flex config then it defeats the purpose which is why I am asking.&amp;nbsp; From what I have read that does not seem to be the case but I wanted to reach out and ask around.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for any help provided in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brandon.m.strode1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-22T07:35:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FirePower Flex Config</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3346732#M967286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My company is moving overhauling their entire network.&amp;nbsp; A part of this is that we are going from static routing to dynamic routing and moving from a ASA to a FirePower 2110 device.&amp;nbsp; The original design implementation for the dynamic routing was to use EIGRP.&amp;nbsp; The consultant helping to configure the FirePower explained that EIGRP was not compatible with the FMC and that now there is discussion to changing from that to OSPF.&amp;nbsp; After a bit of research I found that you can use the flex config option to use features that are available in the ASA in the FirePower environment.&amp;nbsp; My question is do you lose any functionality on the FirePower by implementing the flex config?&amp;nbsp; If we lose any of the functionality by implementing the flex config then it defeats the purpose which is why I am asking.&amp;nbsp; From what I have read that does not seem to be the case but I wanted to reach out and ask around.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for any help provided in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:35:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3346732#M967286</guid>
      <dc:creator>brandon.m.strode1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-22T07:35:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FirePower Flex Config</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3346925#M967287</link>
      <description>Nope you don't lose functionally. EIGRP is coming to FP soon. FlexConfig is&lt;BR /&gt;used to accelerate the process of implementing FP. It will take cisco&lt;BR /&gt;sometime to migrate ASA features to FP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FlexConfig alone shouldn't be your reason for migrating from EIGRP to OSPF&lt;BR /&gt;unless you have other design reasons. I have implemented it and its working&lt;BR /&gt;fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Same concept if you want to configure DNS servers in FP. At this point of&lt;BR /&gt;time you should use FlexConfig to implement. Its not configurable from FMC.&lt;BR /&gt;There are many other features.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 17:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3346925#M967287</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed al Baqari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-12T17:08:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FirePower Flex Config</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3350045#M967288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the prompt response.&amp;nbsp; I greatly appreciate it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/firepower-flex-config/m-p/3350045#M967288</guid>
      <dc:creator>brandon.m.strode1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-16T18:08:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

