<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Changing Interface Level in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896719#M968992</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rajesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short the answer is yes!  The security-level command with take effect on each new packet put into the state table.  However a quick reboot is always best if possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wharrison2000</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-20T14:25:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Changing Interface Level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896718#M968991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; I have a PIX with 5 Intefaces at present. There is an Inside zone with security level 100 and another zone 'A' with security level 99.The next zone comes with security level 80 only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to add a new 6th Interface with a security level in between  Inside and level 'A'. The PIX is operational . Can I reduce the secutiry level of 'A' to say 95 and give the new interface a security level of 98. will the PIX take in the command, and if does will it cause any issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rajesh&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896718#M968991</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajesh1331</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:14:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Changing Interface Level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896719#M968992</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rajesh,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short the answer is yes!  The security-level command with take effect on each new packet put into the state table.  However a quick reboot is always best if possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:25:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896719#M968992</guid>
      <dc:creator>wharrison2000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-20T14:25:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Changing Interface Level</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896720#M968993</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You Bill....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/changing-interface-level/m-p/896720#M968993</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajesh1331</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-22T12:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

