<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA failover upgrade path question in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775824#M969148</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;no worries. I hope you find the community supportive and beneficial. we all here to help each other and learn. This is a great place to contribute in order to enhance knowledge. hope you find it helpful. all the best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feel free to post any question.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 09:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-09T09:22:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3337450#M969118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are several questions on these support forums&amp;nbsp;regarding upgrade paths. &lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/upgrade/asa-upgrade/planning.html#ID-2152-0000000a" target="_self"&gt;This link&lt;/A&gt; has been shared a lot. I have read it, but I still have a question/concern.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have an active/standby failover pair of 5525-X ASAs currently running 9.4(4)16. Typically the way I have&amp;nbsp;zero-downtime upgraded them is to put the new code on both and set it to boot from it, then reboot the standby so it comes up with the new version. Then make the standby active, and reboot the formerly-active one.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I read long ago that a running pair should always be within 0.1 versions of each other (notwithstanding the 8.4-to-9.0 upgrade ). Is that not true anymore? The link above indicates 9.4 can be upgraded directly to 9.9. That means that the standby can be running 9.9 while the active is running 9.4 for a time and still retain stateful failover?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3337450#M969118</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Glosson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:26:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3337452#M969119</link>
      <description>If you are not doing state-full failover (aka you are doing stateless failover) you should be fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are doing statefull failover and you want to upgrade directly, I would go back to stateless, upgrade (like you have been doing) and then on statefull again.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3337452#M969119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip D'Ath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-25T18:53:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3337466#M969120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have always only done it in state&lt;STRONG&gt;ful&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;EM&gt;not&lt;/EM&gt; state&lt;STRONG&gt;less&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode. Just to be clear, by "stateful,"&amp;nbsp;I mean that when failover occurs it &lt;EM&gt;maintains the state&lt;/EM&gt; of the TCP, UDP, ESP, etc sessions that are in place without disruption. My question is whether or not I can do &lt;EM&gt;that&lt;/EM&gt; while upgrading directly from 9.4 to 9.9. I would love to be pointed to some official Cisco documentation that addresses that exact question, if such a document exists.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For the record, here is my failover configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;failover
failover lan unit primary
failover lan interface fo GigabitEthernet0/7
failover polltime unit 1 holdtime 5
failover key *****
failover replication http
failover link fo GigabitEthernet0/7
failover interface ip fo 1.1.1.245 255.255.255.252 standby 1.1.1.246&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:06:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3337466#M969120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Glosson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-25T20:06:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774141#M969122</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;May i know if you still achieve a zero downtime (TCP sessions not dropped) when you upgraded from 9.4 directly to 9.9? I'm planning to upgrade from&amp;nbsp;9.6(4)8 to 9.9.2 directly.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:19:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774141#M969122</guid>
      <dc:creator>drlbaluyut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:19:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774149#M969123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you can upgrade from 9.4.x to 9.9x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="upgrade.PNG" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27237i2ABB417A167735E5/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="upgrade.PNG" alt="upgrade.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes your config is correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;failover
failover lan unit primary
failover lan interface fo GigabitEthernet0/7
failover polltime unit 1 holdtime 5
failover key *****
failover replication http
failover link fo GigabitEthernet0/7
failover interface ip fo 1.1.1.245 255.255.255.252 standby 1.1.1.246&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;also make sure you secondary box. the other asa have the following config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;failover
failover lan unit secondary
failover lan interface fo GigabitEthernet0/7
failover polltime unit 1 holdtime 5
failover key *****
failover replication http
failover link fo GigabitEthernet0/7
failover interface ip fo 1.1.1.245 255.255.255.252 standby 1.1.1.246&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;also bear in mind if you have a sub-interface on these firewall than you have to add them in monitor purpose&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;monitor-interface gigx.xxx&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;having said that. normal interface the one do not have a sub-interface are automatically added as monitor interface. than its depends which interface you want to monitor for failover.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774149#M969123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774162#M969125</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I know my configuration is correct--I wasn't asking for clarification on that. I was asking if anybody knows if you can upgrade from 9.4.4 to 9.9.x, which apparently nobody does.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:40:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774162#M969125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Glosson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:40:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774165#M969126</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;here is the cisco upgrade path recommendation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;seems you can easy do a upgrade to new version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:42:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774165#M969126</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:42:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774170#M969128</link>
      <description>Hi Radio_City&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, but i'm confused about the zero downtime for failover pairs from this link&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/asa-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/111867-asa-failover-upgrade.html#zerotime" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/asa-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/111867-asa-failover-upgrade.html#zerotime&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So how can i achieve zero downtime when i upgrade from 9.6(x) to 9.9(x) directly?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:49:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774170#M969128</guid>
      <dc:creator>drlbaluyut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:49:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774178#M969131</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here an official upgrade guide:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/upgrade/asa-upgrade/asa-appliance-asav.html#concept_F0701C3A86854801958757CEF1E4D999" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/upgrade/asa-upgrade/asa-appliance-asav.html#concept_F0701C3A86854801958757CEF1E4D999&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To summarize, upgrade for failover asa is straight forward:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- copy new image to active and standby devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- change the boot config to boot using new image.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- reload standby with the new image.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- when reloaded, force a failover from active to new reloaded standby.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- reload old active with new software.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- force back active role if you want.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;during this process when you reload the standby firewall with new image it will come online. and it will tell you its version does not match with peer ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is explained in previous thread.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the link you shared i have used in past. its very accurate you can follow the same process. there will be no downtime to your network.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:57:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774178#M969131</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:57:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774183#M969132</link>
      <description>So to achieve zero downtime during upgrade for failover pairs from 9.6(x) to 9.9(x), i don't need to do 9.6(x)-&amp;gt;9.7(x)-&amp;gt;9.8(x)-&amp;gt;9.9(x)? Because the link below suggested it. I don't know if that's outdated or not&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/asa-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/111867-asa-failover-upgrade.html#zerotime" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/asa-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/111867-asa-failover-upgrade.html#zerotime&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:57:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774183#M969132</guid>
      <dc:creator>drlbaluyut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:57:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774184#M969134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I never did. We're still at 9.4.x and I've just been doing the incremental security updates. It's still a “suggested release”&amp;nbsp;on Cisco's &lt;A href="https://software.cisco.com/download/home/284143129/type/280775065/release/9.4.4%20Interim" target="_self"&gt;ASA software page&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 14:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774184#M969134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Glosson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T14:58:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774185#M969136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;here is the link&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H1&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Release Notes for the Cisco ASA Series, 9.9(x)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you can go from 9.6 to 9.9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="upgrade2.PNG" style="width: 977px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.cisco.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/27239i7B4522C59E5F26D5/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="upgrade2.PNG" alt="upgrade2.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774185#M969136</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T15:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774192#M969137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My personal frustration is that there is no single document that indicates both a zero-downtime upgrade AND version-specific info in regards to 9.x upgrades beyond a "point one" version. The one you sent a few times indicates one can upgrade from 9.4 to 9.9 (as well as a whole bunch of other options in the grid), but it does not indicate zero downtime during that upgrade. Anyway, I'll eventually just have to bite the bullet when Cisco discontinues support for 9.4.x, but until then, I'm in no rush. I wish I had a spare failover pair, but we don't have that luxury (I do have spare 5510 ASAs, but those won't run anything newer than 9.1).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:05:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774192#M969137</guid>
      <dc:creator>Matt Glosson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T15:05:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774198#M969138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;i have some spare box 5516-x i shall check and let you know if there is a jump available in 9.4 to 9.9&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 15:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3774198#M969138</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-07T15:11:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775275#M969140</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi I did setup a test lab &amp;nbsp;failover on 2x5516-x from version 9.6 to 9.9. It was successful upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 17:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775275#M969140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-08T17:07:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775684#M969141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That's good to know. Specifically i will upgrade from 9.6(4)3 to 9.9(2). Thanks for your confirmation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 05:18:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775684#M969141</guid>
      <dc:creator>drlbaluyut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T05:18:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775786#M969143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is zero downtime when upgrading an HA pair of ASA appliances from ASA 9.4(x) to ASA 9.9(x) software.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:38:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775786#M969143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marvin Rhoads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T08:38:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775791#M969144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is what i said Marin after looking at cisco asa software matrix. but this gentleman was not very convince so to clear his doubts i run this test on my ASA-X series 9.6 to 9.9 in HA pair the upgrade was a success.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also reading the documentation 9.4 to going to 9.9 is also a zero downtime.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa99/release/notes/asarn99.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.cisco.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133439"&gt;@drlbaluyut&lt;/a&gt;kinldy please mark this as answered so other tech guy can find this useful post.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:46:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775791#M969144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T08:46:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775822#M969146</link>
      <description>Hi Radio_City&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to mark this as answered but i'm not the thread starter.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 09:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775822#M969146</guid>
      <dc:creator>drlbaluyut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T09:19:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA failover upgrade path question</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775824#M969148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;no worries. I hope you find the community supportive and beneficial. we all here to help each other and learn. This is a great place to contribute in order to enhance knowledge. hope you find it helpful. all the best.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feel free to post any question.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 09:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-failover-upgrade-path-question/m-p/3775824#M969148</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheraz.Salim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T09:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

