<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pix 506e - 1721 connection problem in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506e-1721-connection-problem/m-p/876750#M969238</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be better if you do NAT on PIX and not on the router.This way you can put the fa interface of router on a public ip address  and connect this to the PIX. I don't think using virtual interfacs will solve your problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:53:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amritpatek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-24T16:53:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pix 506e - 1721 connection problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506e-1721-connection-problem/m-p/876749#M969237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to change my border router to a 1721 with one sdsl and one adsl&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface. This then connects to a pix 506e but the 1721 has been&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;configured with public ip's on the wan's (each ip is from a different&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;range) they are then nated on the fa to a private ip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My problem - is that the pix 506e has a public ip and is configured to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;deal with various operations which need a public ip. So the fa int on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the router needs to have a public ip and no nat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;someone has suggested virtual int's on both pix and router ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;is this possible ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ps Ive posted the config from the router&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:12:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506e-1721-connection-problem/m-p/876749#M969237</guid>
      <dc:creator>handley88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:12:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pix 506e - 1721 connection problem</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506e-1721-connection-problem/m-p/876750#M969238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It will be better if you do NAT on PIX and not on the router.This way you can put the fa interface of router on a public ip address  and connect this to the PIX. I don't think using virtual interfacs will solve your problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:53:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/pix-506e-1721-connection-problem/m-p/876750#M969238</guid>
      <dc:creator>amritpatek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-24T16:53:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

