<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replace Primary of Failover Pair in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861194#M969395</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually control does not automatically flip back should the master come back up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In regards to the question the primary/standby role as strictly defined in the pix is not really valid per se. When the new ASA comes in add the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do not reverse the interface IP Addresses, the ASA will understand and assign them correctly automagically&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The key points you will need to change are &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary to Secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Choose the right interface and ip address for your network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;?failover lan unit primary ?failover lan interface FAILOVER g0/3 ?failover link FAILOVER g0/3 ?failover interface ip FAILOVER 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 standby 10.10.10.2 ?failover key cisco123 ?failover replication http &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>whisperwind</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-20T18:28:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replace Primary of Failover Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861192#M969391</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One of my failover pair of ASA 5520s need to be replaced. It is the primary unit. Will the following commands suffice:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; description LAN/STATE Failover Interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; speed 1000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; duplex full&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan unit primary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover lan interface State_Failovr GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover link State_Failovr GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;failover interface ip State_Failovr 10.10.30.161 255.255.255.248 standby 10.10.30.162&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interface GigabitEthernet0/3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; no shutdown&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess what I'm asking is what is the logic. Once the new unit is configured it will come up as active before it sees the secondary which is also active. Once communication is established over the failover link, will the secondary remain the active ASA since it has been up the longest or will the primary remain the active ASA since this is the first contact with the secondary as far as it knows?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861192#M969391</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeffland_98</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:11:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replace Primary of Failover Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861193#M969392</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From your description I think that you are using Active/Standby failover. In this scenario when the active (master) unit goes down the standby unit takes over as the active unit and it will constantly poll to check if the master unit is available and is working fine. if the master unit is availalbe it will then transfer the control to the master unit making it once again the active unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861193#M969392</guid>
      <dc:creator>didyap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-20T18:12:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replace Primary of Failover Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861194#M969395</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually control does not automatically flip back should the master come back up.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In regards to the question the primary/standby role as strictly defined in the pix is not really valid per se. When the new ASA comes in add the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do not reverse the interface IP Addresses, the ASA will understand and assign them correctly automagically&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The key points you will need to change are &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Primary to Secondary&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Choose the right interface and ip address for your network&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;?failover lan unit primary ?failover lan interface FAILOVER g0/3 ?failover link FAILOVER g0/3 ?failover interface ip FAILOVER 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 standby 10.10.10.2 ?failover key cisco123 ?failover replication http &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861194#M969395</guid>
      <dc:creator>whisperwind</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-20T18:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replace Primary of Failover Pair</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861195#M969399</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, this is an active /standby pair in a single security context. Thanks for your reply but I've already replaced the failed unit. I first connected the failover link, then powered up the replacement ASA having put in only the config in my previous message. The new Primary unit made contact with the Active /secondary unit, downloaded the active running configuration, and then went into standby mode. I then connected the other ports on the primary unit and it is running in standby mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:34:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/replace-primary-of-failover-pair/m-p/861195#M969399</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeffland_98</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-25T15:34:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

