<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ASA route-map with nat issue in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3335762#M969998</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A couple of things we need to fix to start:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. we need a less preferred route for the dmz2 interface so that traffic can leave the dmz2 interface upon the PBR lookup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route dmz2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 254&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. The static NAT statement below is incorrect because you are trying to statically map multiple source to a specific destination ip address. Either make it dynamic instead of static or define as many destination ip addresses as the source&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static LAN-USERS obj-192.168.0.3&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. I don't think you would require static arp entries, you can remove as per my opinion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once the above changes are done, try to run a packet-tracer or take syslogs so that we can see where this is failing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AJ&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ajay Saini</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-22T10:19:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ASA route-map with nat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3335335#M969996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;am having 2 issues as below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;am having asa 5508-X&amp;nbsp; ver 9.8, some of the Lan users have to reach internet via outside (&lt;STRONG&gt;OK&lt;/STRONG&gt;) interface and some via dmz2(&lt;STRONG&gt;not OK&lt;/STRONG&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Default route is via outside port.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lan users that go via outside port are determind &lt;STRONG&gt;object-group network LAN-USERS&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My issue is with the users that determined with satellite&lt;STRONG&gt; access list&lt;/STRONG&gt; as &lt;STRONG&gt;attached&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the configuration.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Their GW is determined with route-map in addition to the below nat&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,dmz2) dynamic interface&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;also i used nat (inside,dmz2) soure static SAT-USERS interface&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;they cannot reach internet?????????&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;my second issue is:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;dspite i configure arp for LAN-USERS as shown in the config, it has no infuence.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want only the users configured in the object-group network &lt;STRONG&gt;LAN-USERS&lt;/STRONG&gt; list in addition to their mac address to access internet via outside port.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;hope the above issues are clear and you can help&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 15:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3335335#M969996</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Al-odhari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-21T15:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA route-map with nat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3335762#M969998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A couple of things we need to fix to start:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. we need a less preferred route for the dmz2 interface so that traffic can leave the dmz2 interface upon the PBR lookup.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;route dmz2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 254&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. The static NAT statement below is incorrect because you are trying to statically map multiple source to a specific destination ip address. Either make it dynamic instead of static or define as many destination ip addresses as the source&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;nat (inside,outside) source static LAN-USERS obj-192.168.0.3&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. I don't think you would require static arp entries, you can remove as per my opinion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once the above changes are done, try to run a packet-tracer or take syslogs so that we can see where this is failing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;AJ&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:19:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3335762#M969998</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ajay Saini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-22T10:19:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ASA route-map with nat issue</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3336206#M969999</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks alot Ajay for replaying,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;as per the config, Two interfaces has to reach internet, outside and dmz2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For dmz2,so i want only to add less preferred route as you said in addition to this nat ( nat (inside,dmz2) dynamic interface &lt;STRONG&gt;or&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; nat (inside,dmz2) soure static SAT-USERS interface ) ????&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2&lt;/STRONG&gt;- for outside, change nat to--&amp;gt; nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface as you suggest or define many destination ip addresses you mean under the obj-192.168.0.3???&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3&lt;/STRONG&gt;- i dont get your below point three.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i have many hosts defined under &lt;STRONG&gt;object-group network LAN-USERS&lt;/STRONG&gt;, about 100 users, to reach the normal default route, is it possible in asa that for this list- mac address must be checked, &lt;STRONG&gt;i mean&lt;/STRONG&gt; ,hosts that defined under the LAN-USERS list is to be blocked from internet until their mac addresses is checked?????&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;thanks for cooperation and will wait for your answers&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:09:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/asa-route-map-with-nat-issue/m-p/3336206#M969999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mohammed Al-odhari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-22T20:09:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

