<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IDS Drop vs. Reset in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360835#M97163</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I understand that Dropping a packet prevents the connection from getting into your network, and a TCP Reset resets the connection in both directions. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isn't that functionally pretty much the same thing? Either way, you're ending the connection, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since TCP Reset only works on TCP traffic, why even use it? Doesn't dropping the connection pretty much take care of that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>r-lemaster</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:15:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IDS Drop vs. Reset</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360835#M97163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I understand that Dropping a packet prevents the connection from getting into your network, and a TCP Reset resets the connection in both directions. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Isn't that functionally pretty much the same thing? Either way, you're ending the connection, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since TCP Reset only works on TCP traffic, why even use it? Doesn't dropping the connection pretty much take care of that?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360835#M97163</guid>
      <dc:creator>r-lemaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:15:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IDS Drop vs. Reset</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360836#M97166</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;for TCP based connections, when you RESET them, then the connection resets. But dropping a packet not necessarily means a connection is torn down. Sender can resend the dropped packets (which eventually will reset the connection if a configured number of drop/resend happens)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nadeem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 23:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360836#M97166</guid>
      <dc:creator>nkhawaja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-01T23:40:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IDS Drop vs. Reset</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360837#M97168</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;An issue to consider is that of system resources.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the IPS drops the connection (or packets), the connection is not able to continue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BUT both the client and server believe that the connection is still underway and will resend packets, and keep the system resources open until an eventual timeout happens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With TCP Reset, on the other hand the client and server know the connection has been reset and can free up the system resources and stop doing resends.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCP Reset by itself, however, does not guarantee the connection will go away.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCP Reset is a best guess at the sequence numbers to get the connection to be reset.  You are in effect hijacking the connection, and hijacking does not always work (especially in fast connections).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If all you are worried about is stopping an attack then dropping the packets works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if you are worries about dropping the attacks as well as freeing up system resources (especially a web server that may be under constant attack in the case of worms) I would recommend using both the drop action and reset actions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SIDE NOTE:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IDS version 4.1 software supports TCP Resets, but does not support drop actions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IPS version 5.0 (yet to be released) will support a new InLine feature that does support drop like actions (they are termed deny actions in IPS v5.0).  So in 5.0 you may want to do both a deny action and a tcp reset action on signatures that fire often.  This way your servers won't waste resources on connections that have already been dropped by the IPS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360837#M97168</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcabal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-02T00:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IDS Drop vs. Reset</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360838#M97171</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any Plans for an IPS version of the IDSM-2?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360838#M97171</guid>
      <dc:creator>dbobeldyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-09T20:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IDS Drop vs. Reset</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360839#M97172</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is this will be supported too&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:48:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360839#M97172</guid>
      <dc:creator>ishah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-18T23:48:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IDS Drop vs. Reset</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360840#M97174</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IDSM-2 is being supported for both the older Promiscuous functionality and the new InLine functionality (with the deny actions) in the soon to be released IPS version 5.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:04:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/ids-drop-vs-reset/m-p/360840#M97174</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcabal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-20T21:04:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

