<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VPN ip range in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809432#M971989</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;one side or the other needs to nat their network BEFORE the crypto map is applied..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so the nat acl will match the newly nat'ed address space&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The side that doesn't do any nat, will have to make sure their crypto acl's match the newly nat'ed address on the other side also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-02T14:16:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VPN ip range</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809430#M971987</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wondering if it is possible to set up a site to site with both sites on the same inside address range. For example. 192.168.16.0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so can I write an access list eg access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.16.0 255... 192.168.16.0 255..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:52:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809430#M971987</guid>
      <dc:creator>danparsons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T10:52:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN ip range</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809431#M971988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Mr Parsons...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its Jay!!! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, you have a over lapping IP address issue, well it can be achived - want to come and chat?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:14:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809431#M971988</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-02T14:14:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VPN ip range</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809432#M971989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;one side or the other needs to nat their network BEFORE the crypto map is applied..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so the nat acl will match the newly nat'ed address space&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The side that doesn't do any nat, will have to make sure their crypto acl's match the newly nat'ed address on the other side also.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:16:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/vpn-ip-range/m-p/809432#M971989</guid>
      <dc:creator>srue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-02T14:16:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

