<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RDEP vs SDEE in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rdep-vs-sdee/m-p/394528#M97292</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm sure someone from Cisco will correct me if I'm wrong but, IIRC, SDEE is actually an evolution of Cisco's RDEP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RDEP was developed first by Cisco as an in-house replacement for the less secure UDP-based &amp;#147;PostOffice&amp;#148; protocol. Then, in association with the other industry partners in the SDEE consortium, the new "standard" was developed with RDEP as the basis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an aside, SDEE is an industry attempt to standardize security device reporting in response to a lack of action from the IETF IDMEF effort. Also, RDEP v2 (again, Cisco will correct me if I'm wrong) will be fully SDEE compliant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex Arndt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>a.arndt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-01-18T13:29:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RDEP vs SDEE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rdep-vs-sdee/m-p/394527#M97291</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can anybody explain, why cisco introduced SDEE in IOS routers? What is bad with RDEP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oleg Tipisov,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Redcenter,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Moscow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2019 09:14:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rdep-vs-sdee/m-p/394527#M97291</guid>
      <dc:creator>ovt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-10T09:14:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RDEP vs SDEE</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rdep-vs-sdee/m-p/394528#M97292</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm sure someone from Cisco will correct me if I'm wrong but, IIRC, SDEE is actually an evolution of Cisco's RDEP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RDEP was developed first by Cisco as an in-house replacement for the less secure UDP-based &amp;#147;PostOffice&amp;#148; protocol. Then, in association with the other industry partners in the SDEE consortium, the new "standard" was developed with RDEP as the basis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As an aside, SDEE is an industry attempt to standardize security device reporting in response to a lack of action from the IETF IDMEF effort. Also, RDEP v2 (again, Cisco will correct me if I'm wrong) will be fully SDEE compliant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex Arndt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/rdep-vs-sdee/m-p/394528#M97292</guid>
      <dc:creator>a.arndt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-18T13:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

