<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875860#M973330</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chun, few questions for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1- Do you have any other static working or is it only this static that does not work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2- make sure inside host  does not have firewall turned on. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3- make sure hosts is listening to ports you have indicated in your access-list for this static nat translation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you post the output of the follwing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If running code 6.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"show sysopt "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if running 7.x,8.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"show running-config sysopt " &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-22T15:17:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875859#M973329</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to create a static NAT for an outside server to access an inside server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) a.b.c.d 1.2.3.4 netmask 255.255.255.255&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Xlate table shows that static NAT took place&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Packet capture shows the destination IP address becomes 0.0.0.0, which really puzzles me.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is someone able to shed some light on this? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/chunsing&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ASA# sh cap ACS trace&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;42 packets captured&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   1: 10:58:57.102732 &amp;lt;IP_Addr_of_ext_svr&amp;gt;.2406 &amp;gt; a.b.c.d.1645:  udp 54&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;...truncated ...&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase: 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type: ACCESS-LIST&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subtype: log&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-group outside_in in interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_in extended permit ip object-group EJPROXY_SVRS host a.b.c.d&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group network EJPROXY_SVRS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object host &amp;lt;IP_Addr_of_ext_svr&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; in  id=0x4666550, priority=12, domain=permit, deny=false&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        hits=7, user_data=0x45a8278, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        src ip=&amp;lt;IP_Addr_of_ext_svr&amp;gt;, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        dst ip=a.b.c.d, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;           &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;...truncated ...&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Phase: 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type: CAPTURE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subtype:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Result: ALLOW&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Config:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; in  id=0x3e43060, priority=12, domain=capture, deny=false&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        hits=1, user_data=0x4596d30, cs_id=0x461cf98, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        src ip=&amp;lt;IP_Addr_of_ext_svr&amp;gt;, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;        dst ip=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0  *****dst IP becomes 0.0.0.0******&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875859#M973329</guid>
      <dc:creator>chunsingkerk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:28:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875860#M973330</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chun, few questions for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1- Do you have any other static working or is it only this static that does not work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2- make sure inside host  does not have firewall turned on. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3- make sure hosts is listening to ports you have indicated in your access-list for this static nat translation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;could you post the output of the follwing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If running code 6.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"show sysopt "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if running 7.x,8.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"show running-config sysopt " &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:17:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875860#M973330</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-22T15:17:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875861#M973331</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jorgemcse,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) This is the only static that isn't work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 &amp;amp; 3) The inside host doesn't have firewall and is able to response to requests from another internal hosts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ICES-ASA# show running-config sysopt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no sysopt connection timewait&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sysopt connection tcpmss 1380&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sysopt connection tcpmss minimum 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no sysopt nodnsalias inbound&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no sysopt nodnsalias outbound&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;no sysopt radius ignore-secret&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sysopt connection permit-vpn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ICES-ASA#&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875861#M973331</guid>
      <dc:creator>chunsingkerk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T01:57:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875862#M973332</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suspected something else with sysopt output,are you allowing  TCP ports or IP services ? I think the problem could be in your acl allowing IP instead of TCP services .  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e.g.   I lab this out  with defining an outside group called  vendor_group and their forein Ip address, then defined TCP service group called TES_Group allowing  domain, ftp , rdp TCP services  to access inside host a.b.c.d  the acl should be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside__in  extended permit tcp object-group OUtside_Vendor host a.b.c.d  object-group TEST_GROUP &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;      access-group outside_in in  interface outside&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or somewhere along these lines, define the ouside hosts in your network object group as well as define the TCP services object group to be allowed. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:03:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875862#M973332</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T04:03:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875863#M973333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, have checked my acl and is same as your suggestion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list outside_in extended permit udp object-group EJPROXY_SVRS host a.b.c.d eq radius&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;object-group network EJPROXY_SVRS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object host &lt;EXTERNAL ip="" 1=""&gt;&lt;/EXTERNAL&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; network-object host &lt;EXTERNAL ip="" 2=""&gt;&lt;/EXTERNAL&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;---------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Doing a "show access-list outside_in" indicates that acl is matched.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've done a permit any-any but still can't work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875863#M973333</guid>
      <dc:creator>chunsingkerk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T04:51:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875864#M973334</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;how is the static nat translation does it have a unique public IP for the inside host? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for sake of testing create tcp rdp acl and test from outside doing "telnet PublicIP 3389" to see if you can reach it.   &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875864#M973334</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T05:09:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875865#M973335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;your acl is still udps instead of tcp, it is on what the the server is listening , if you do on the server netstat you will note TCP listening ports not udp and that could be reason you're not hiting it.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875865#M973335</guid>
      <dc:creator>JORGE RODRIGUEZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T05:30:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static NAT doesn't seems work</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875866#M973336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jorgemcse,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your assistance, the server is listening for radius on 1645/udp rather that tcp. As suggested I've verified using netstat.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In fact, I've done a permit ip any-any which should include all udp and tcp packets, but server is not receiving the packets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a unique public NAT for the internal server as well. I believe the flow breaks after the translation (outside to inside) where destination IP address becomes 0.0.0.0 hence packet goes back out the outside interface (default route is to outside interface)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/static-nat-doesn-t-seems-work/m-p/875866#M973336</guid>
      <dc:creator>chunsingkerk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T12:50:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

