<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: More efficient Access List/Static Statements in Network Security</title>
    <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/more-efficient-access-list-static-statements/m-p/856668#M973477</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host x.x.x.x range 9000 9005&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-18T12:06:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>More efficient Access List/Static Statements</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/more-efficient-access-list-static-statements/m-p/856667#M973475</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I Have a PIX 515 6.3(5).  I need to allow outside web access to a host from the outside; opening ports 9000-9005.  Here is an example of the code, that I have come up with.  &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a better way to write this (e.g. One statement with a range of ports versus a separate line for each one.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq www &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 9002 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 9003 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 9005 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 9000 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 9001 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 9004 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X www 10.100.x.x www netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X 9000 10.100.x.x 9000 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X 9001 10.100.x.x 9001 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X 9002 10.100.x.x 9002 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X 9003 10.100.x.x 9003 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X 9004 10.100.x.x 9004 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;static (inside,outside) tcp X.X.X.X 9005 10.100.x.x 9005 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/more-efficient-access-list-static-statements/m-p/856667#M973475</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsinghnyc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-11T11:27:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: More efficient Access List/Static Statements</title>
      <link>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/more-efficient-access-list-static-statements/m-p/856668#M973477</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;access-list 107 permit tcp any host x.x.x.x range 9000 9005&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please rate helpful posts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:06:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.cisco.com/t5/network-security/more-efficient-access-list-static-statements/m-p/856668#M973477</guid>
      <dc:creator>acomiskey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-18T12:06:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

